Resistance of Hindu Traditionalist Against Sampradaya Hare Krishna Bali

Raudatul Ulum, Lutfi Firdausi
{"title":"Resistance of Hindu Traditionalist Against Sampradaya Hare Krishna Bali","authors":"Raudatul Ulum, Lutfi Firdausi","doi":"10.18784/analisa.v6i02.1432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted to understand the tension between two internal Hindu religious groups in Bali since 1984. The tension shows resistance of Balinese traditional Hindus to the Sampradaya or the spiritualist group of the Hare Krishna consciousness movement. The feud started from a hate speech on social media from both sides that leads to physical persecution. The research was conducted using a case study method, with interviews and observations at the scene and religious practices. This study found out that the conflict was rooted in different religious understandings between the Hare Krishna Gaudy Vaisnava theology and Balinese Hindu Traditional, as well as differences in acceptance of Balinese religious traditions. The contestation of the two parties escalated the feud on social media, then heated up to the closing of Hare Krishna's religious activities. The accumulation of tension was also triggered by religious activities and the appearance of Hare Krishna followers was considered to be in contrast to the Balinese traditional community, and the rite system was considered not to reflect Balinese customs. The research concludes that the institutional interaction between the two parties is deadlocked, although so far there is still a safety valve, namely Nyama Baraya, but the potential for conflict still arises. Similarity of ethnic background; dialogue intentions do not find common ground, the reintegration process is threatened with failure. A solution through dialogue is still the best step compared to resolving power or law enforcement, therefore efforts to bring the two parties together in dialogue must continue.","PeriodicalId":102671,"journal":{"name":"Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18784/analisa.v6i02.1432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was conducted to understand the tension between two internal Hindu religious groups in Bali since 1984. The tension shows resistance of Balinese traditional Hindus to the Sampradaya or the spiritualist group of the Hare Krishna consciousness movement. The feud started from a hate speech on social media from both sides that leads to physical persecution. The research was conducted using a case study method, with interviews and observations at the scene and religious practices. This study found out that the conflict was rooted in different religious understandings between the Hare Krishna Gaudy Vaisnava theology and Balinese Hindu Traditional, as well as differences in acceptance of Balinese religious traditions. The contestation of the two parties escalated the feud on social media, then heated up to the closing of Hare Krishna's religious activities. The accumulation of tension was also triggered by religious activities and the appearance of Hare Krishna followers was considered to be in contrast to the Balinese traditional community, and the rite system was considered not to reflect Balinese customs. The research concludes that the institutional interaction between the two parties is deadlocked, although so far there is still a safety valve, namely Nyama Baraya, but the potential for conflict still arises. Similarity of ethnic background; dialogue intentions do not find common ground, the reintegration process is threatened with failure. A solution through dialogue is still the best step compared to resolving power or law enforcement, therefore efforts to bring the two parties together in dialogue must continue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度教传统主义者对三普拉达亚哈里奎师那巴厘岛的抵抗
这项研究是为了了解自1984年以来巴厘岛内部两个印度教团体之间的紧张关系。这种紧张局势显示了巴厘岛传统印度教徒对三普拉达亚(Sampradaya)或哈瑞奎师那意识运动的唯心主义团体的抵制。这场争斗始于双方在社交媒体上发表仇恨言论,并导致人身迫害。本研究采用个案研究方法,在现场和宗教实践中进行访谈和观察。本研究发现,冲突的根源在于克利须那派高迪毗湿奴派神学与巴厘印度教传统的不同宗教理解,以及对巴厘宗教传统接受程度的差异。双方的争论在社交媒体上升级了仇恨,然后升温到克利须那的宗教活动被关闭。宗教活动也引发了紧张局势的积累,哈瑞奎师那信徒的出现被认为与巴厘传统社区形成对比,仪式制度被认为不反映巴厘习俗。研究得出的结论是,两党之间的制度互动陷入僵局,尽管到目前为止仍有一个安全阀,即Nyama Baraya,但冲突的可能性仍然存在。民族背景的相似性;对话意图找不到共同点,重新融合进程面临失败的威胁。与解决权力或执法相比,通过对话解决仍然是最好的步骤,因此必须继续努力使双方在对话中走到一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Paradigm Shift Toward the Transformation of Nahdlatul Ulama’s Political Orientation Communication and Genealogical System of Mosque Imam: a Study in East Lombok and North Lombok, Indonesia The Educational Axiology of Al-Maqbul Traditional Pesantren Tolerance Learning in Islamic Religious and Character Education Textbooks Construction of Integrated Islamic School Identity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1