Tax Simplicity and Heterogeneous Learning

P. Aghion, Ufuk Akcigit, M. Lequien, Stefanie Stantcheva
{"title":"Tax Simplicity and Heterogeneous Learning","authors":"P. Aghion, Ufuk Akcigit, M. Lequien, Stefanie Stantcheva","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3132923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study how strongly individuals respond to tax simplicity and how they learn about the complexities of the tax system. We focus on the self-employed, who can more easily adjust to tax incentives and whose responses directly stem from their own understanding of the tax system. We use new French tax returns data from 1994 to 2012. France serves as a good quasi-laboratory: it has three fiscal regimes – or modes of taxation – for the self-employed, which differ in their monetary tax incentives and in their tax simplicity. Two key features are that, first, these regimes are subject to eligibility thresholds; we find large excess masses (bunching) right below the latter. Second, the regimes impact different agents heterogeneously and have changed extensively over time. Taken together, these two key elements give us measures of tax responses (the bunching) as well as the variation needed to jointly estimate a value of tax simplicity and taxable income elasticities. They also give us an opportunity to study how individuals learn about and respond over time to changing policy parameters. We estimate a large value for tax simplicity of up to 650 euros per year per individual depending on the regime and activity. We also find sizable costs of tax complexity; agents are not immediately able to understand what the right regime choice is, leave significant money on the table, and learn over time. The cost of complexity is “regressive” in that it affects mostly the uneducated, low income, and low skill agents. Agents who can be viewed as more informed and knowledgeable (e.g., the more educated or high-skilled) are more likely to make the correct regime choice and to learn faster.","PeriodicalId":325993,"journal":{"name":"Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3132923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

We study how strongly individuals respond to tax simplicity and how they learn about the complexities of the tax system. We focus on the self-employed, who can more easily adjust to tax incentives and whose responses directly stem from their own understanding of the tax system. We use new French tax returns data from 1994 to 2012. France serves as a good quasi-laboratory: it has three fiscal regimes – or modes of taxation – for the self-employed, which differ in their monetary tax incentives and in their tax simplicity. Two key features are that, first, these regimes are subject to eligibility thresholds; we find large excess masses (bunching) right below the latter. Second, the regimes impact different agents heterogeneously and have changed extensively over time. Taken together, these two key elements give us measures of tax responses (the bunching) as well as the variation needed to jointly estimate a value of tax simplicity and taxable income elasticities. They also give us an opportunity to study how individuals learn about and respond over time to changing policy parameters. We estimate a large value for tax simplicity of up to 650 euros per year per individual depending on the regime and activity. We also find sizable costs of tax complexity; agents are not immediately able to understand what the right regime choice is, leave significant money on the table, and learn over time. The cost of complexity is “regressive” in that it affects mostly the uneducated, low income, and low skill agents. Agents who can be viewed as more informed and knowledgeable (e.g., the more educated or high-skilled) are more likely to make the correct regime choice and to learn faster.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
税收简洁性和异构学习
我们研究个人对税收简化的反应有多强烈,以及他们如何了解税收制度的复杂性。我们关注的是个体户,他们更容易适应税收优惠,他们的反应直接源于他们自己对税收制度的理解。我们使用的是1994年至2012年新的法国纳税申报表数据。法国是一个很好的准实验室:它有三种针对个体经营者的财政制度——或税收模式,它们在货币税收激励和税收简单性方面各不相同。两个关键特点是,首先,这些制度受到资格门槛的限制;我们在后者的正下方发现了大量的多余质量(聚束)。其次,这些制度对不同药剂的影响是不同的,并且随着时间的推移发生了广泛的变化。总的来说,这两个关键因素为我们提供了税收反应(聚类)以及共同估计税收简单性和应税收入弹性价值所需的变化的措施。它们还为我们提供了一个机会,研究个人如何随着时间的推移了解和应对不断变化的政策参数。我们估计,根据制度和活动,每个人每年最高可达650欧元的税收简化价值。我们还发现了税收复杂性带来的巨大成本;代理人不能立即理解正确的制度选择是什么,留下大量的钱,并随着时间的推移而学习。复杂性的成本是“递减的”,因为它主要影响未受教育的、低收入的和低技能的代理人。被视为更有见识和知识的代理人(例如,受教育程度更高或技能更高的人)更有可能做出正确的制度选择,并且学习得更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Racial Disparities in Access to Small Business Credit: Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program The Governance of Corporate Culture Big Data Directions in Entrepreneurship Research: Researcher Viewpoints Redesigning the Longitudinal Business Database How is Covid Changing the Geography of Entrepreneurship? Evidence from the Startup Cartography Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1