The Technical Debt Dataset

Valentina Lenarduzzi, Nyyti Saarimäki, D. Taibi
{"title":"The Technical Debt Dataset","authors":"Valentina Lenarduzzi, Nyyti Saarimäki, D. Taibi","doi":"10.1145/3345629.3345630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technical Debt analysis is increasing in popularity as nowadays researchers and industry are adopting various tools for static code analysis to evaluate the quality of their code. Despite this, empirical studies on software projects are expensive because of the time needed to analyze the projects. In addition, the results are difficult to compare as studies commonly consider different projects. In this work, we propose the Technical Debt Dataset, a curated set of project measurement data from 33 Java projects from the Apache Software Foundation. In the Technical Debt Dataset, we analyzed all commits from separately defined time frames with SonarQube to collect Technical Debt information and with Ptidej to detect code smells. Moreover, we extracted all available commit information from the git logs, the refactoring applied with Refactoring Miner, and fault information reported in the issue trackers (Jira). Using this information, we executed the SZZ algorithm to identify the fault-inducing and -fixing commits. We analyzed 78K commits from the selected 33 projects, detecting 1.8M SonarQube issues, 62K code smells, 28K faults and 57K refactorings. The project analysis took more than 200 days. In this paper, we describe the data retrieval pipeline together with the tools used for the analysis. The dataset is made available through CSV files and an SQLite database to facilitate queries on the data. The Technical Debt Dataset aims to open up diverse opportunities for Technical Debt research, enabling researchers to compare results on common projects.","PeriodicalId":424201,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3345629.3345630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

Technical Debt analysis is increasing in popularity as nowadays researchers and industry are adopting various tools for static code analysis to evaluate the quality of their code. Despite this, empirical studies on software projects are expensive because of the time needed to analyze the projects. In addition, the results are difficult to compare as studies commonly consider different projects. In this work, we propose the Technical Debt Dataset, a curated set of project measurement data from 33 Java projects from the Apache Software Foundation. In the Technical Debt Dataset, we analyzed all commits from separately defined time frames with SonarQube to collect Technical Debt information and with Ptidej to detect code smells. Moreover, we extracted all available commit information from the git logs, the refactoring applied with Refactoring Miner, and fault information reported in the issue trackers (Jira). Using this information, we executed the SZZ algorithm to identify the fault-inducing and -fixing commits. We analyzed 78K commits from the selected 33 projects, detecting 1.8M SonarQube issues, 62K code smells, 28K faults and 57K refactorings. The project analysis took more than 200 days. In this paper, we describe the data retrieval pipeline together with the tools used for the analysis. The dataset is made available through CSV files and an SQLite database to facilitate queries on the data. The Technical Debt Dataset aims to open up diverse opportunities for Technical Debt research, enabling researchers to compare results on common projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术债务数据集
技术债务分析越来越受欢迎,因为现在研究人员和行业正在采用各种工具进行静态代码分析以评估其代码的质量。尽管如此,对软件项目的实证研究是昂贵的,因为分析项目需要时间。此外,由于研究通常考虑不同的项目,结果难以比较。在这项工作中,我们提出了技术债务数据集,这是一组来自Apache软件基金会的33个Java项目的项目度量数据。在技术债务数据集中,我们使用SonarQube分析了来自单独定义的时间框架的所有提交,以收集技术债务信息,并使用Ptidej检测代码气味。此外,我们从git日志、refactoring Miner应用的重构以及问题跟踪器(Jira)中报告的故障信息中提取了所有可用的提交信息。使用这些信息,我们执行SZZ算法来识别引起错误和修复错误的提交。我们从选定的33个项目中分析了78K个提交,检测到1.8M个SonarQube问题、62K个代码气味、28K个错误和57K个重构。项目分析耗时200多天。在本文中,我们描述了数据检索管道以及用于分析的工具。数据集通过CSV文件和SQLite数据库提供,以方便对数据的查询。技术债务数据集旨在为技术债务研究开辟各种机会,使研究人员能够比较共同项目的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering An Evaluation of Parameter Pruning Approaches for Software Estimation Which Refactoring Reduces Bug Rate? Reviewer Recommendation using Software Artifact Traceability Graphs Prioritizing automated user interface tests using reinforcement learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1