A New Version of the Reliance Theory

Peter Jaffey
{"title":"A New Version of the Reliance Theory","authors":"Peter Jaffey","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3800100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article contrasts contract law understood in terms of duties of performance based on an exchange of promises with an alternative approach based on an agreement to assume responsibility for reliance. It explains why the reliance approach is not open to the objections made of other versions of the reliance theory of contract, including the “death of contract” theory, or to the “circularity” objection to reliance theories, and it also shows that the suggested reliance approach provides a better account of contract law, both as to the remedial regime and as to various aspects of the substantive law.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3800100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article contrasts contract law understood in terms of duties of performance based on an exchange of promises with an alternative approach based on an agreement to assume responsibility for reliance. It explains why the reliance approach is not open to the objections made of other versions of the reliance theory of contract, including the “death of contract” theory, or to the “circularity” objection to reliance theories, and it also shows that the suggested reliance approach provides a better account of contract law, both as to the remedial regime and as to various aspects of the substantive law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新版本的信赖理论
本文对比了基于交换承诺的履行义务的合同法与基于承担信赖责任的协议的替代方法。它解释了为什么信赖方法不能接受其他版本的合同信赖理论所提出的反对意见,包括“合同死亡”理论,或对信赖理论的“循环”反对意见,它还表明,建议的信赖方法提供了一个更好的合同法解释,无论是在补救制度方面还是在实体法的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La garantía legal del Estatuto del Consumidor como mecanismo para proteger al comprador frente a vicios inmobiliarios progresivos (The Legal Guarantee of the Consumers Statute as a Mechanism to Protect Buyer Front of Progressive Real Estate Vices) Solidarismo y contratos relacionales: alternativas frente a la pandemia de covid-19 (Contractual Solidarism and Relational Contract Theory: Alternative Approaches to Contract Law in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic) Error Correction Mechanisms for Transactional Script Smart Contracts The Shadows of Litigation Finance Malas leyes (Bad Law)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1