A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Query-Focused Extractive Multi-Document Summarization

Yuliska, T. Sakai
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Query-Focused Extractive Multi-Document Summarization","authors":"Yuliska, T. Sakai","doi":"10.1109/INFOCT.2019.8710851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Query-focused multi-document summarization aims to produce a single, short document that summarizes a set of documents that are relevant to a given query. During the past few years, deep learning approaches have been utilized to generate summaries in an abstractive or extractive manner. In this study, we employ six deep neural network approaches to solving a query-focused extractive multi-document summarization task and compare their performances. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to compare deep learning techniques on extractive query-focused multi-document summarization. Our experiments with DUC 2005–2007 benchmark datasets show that Bi-LSTM with Max-pooling achieves the highest performance among the methods compared.","PeriodicalId":369231,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT)","volume":"84 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCT.2019.8710851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Query-focused multi-document summarization aims to produce a single, short document that summarizes a set of documents that are relevant to a given query. During the past few years, deep learning approaches have been utilized to generate summaries in an abstractive or extractive manner. In this study, we employ six deep neural network approaches to solving a query-focused extractive multi-document summarization task and compare their performances. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to compare deep learning techniques on extractive query-focused multi-document summarization. Our experiments with DUC 2005–2007 benchmark datasets show that Bi-LSTM with Max-pooling achieves the highest performance among the methods compared.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向查询的深度学习提取多文档摘要方法的比较研究
以查询为中心的多文档摘要旨在生成一个简短的文档,该文档总结了与给定查询相关的一组文档。在过去的几年中,深度学习方法已被用于以抽象或抽取的方式生成摘要。在这项研究中,我们采用六种深度神经网络方法来解决一个以查询为中心的提取多文档摘要任务,并比较了它们的性能。据我们所知,我们的研究是第一个比较深度学习技术对提取查询为重点的多文档摘要的研究。在DUC 2005-2007的基准数据集上进行的实验表明,采用最大池的Bi-LSTM方法在比较的方法中性能最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utilization of Data Mining for Generalizable, All-Admission Prediction of Inpatient Mortality Development of Navigation Monitoring & Assistance Service Data Model ITIKI Plus: A Mobile Based Application for Integrating Indigenous Knowledge and Scientific Agro-Climate Decision Support for Africa’s Small-Scale Farmers TFDroid: Android Malware Detection by Topics and Sensitive Data Flows Using Machine Learning Techniques Weighted DV-Hop Localization Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Network based on Differential Evolution Algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1