“Disarmed”: Disability, Trauma, and Emasculation in Contemporary Japanese Cinema

Seán O’Reilly
{"title":"“Disarmed”: Disability, Trauma, and Emasculation in Contemporary Japanese Cinema","authors":"Seán O’Reilly","doi":"10.3390/arts7010010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disability, especially when war-related, is dangerous ground for entertainment films. Depictions of battle-scarred living bodies are necessarily political, since they cannot avoid commenting on the conflict of which they are a stark visual reminder. Yet depictions are politically multivalent: seeing the disabled has a wide range of effects on audiences. Unsurprisingly, then, disabled survivors of the war have rarely appeared on postwar screens. But the trend of avoiding the messy reality of war-related disability, and disabled bodies more generally, has ended, as the emphatic success of period drama Love and Honor (2006) can attest. In the new century, many films have tackled this once-taboo topic, winning success at the box office or, like Caterpillar (2010), at film festivals. In this article, I analyze depictions of disabled war survivors and other disabled bodies in recent Japanese films, drawing a contrast between Love and Honor and the aforementioned Caterpillar; I explore what motivated this more visceral retelling of both war trauma and general disability, and why each succeeded either commercially or critically. The trend towards depicting disability coincides perfectly with Japanese cinema’s resurgent success against Hollywood. Visceral depictions of traumatized bodies that are symbolically—or literally—disarmed have resonated with domestic audiences, perhaps because disability not only emasculates, it can also empower: the disabled, many believe, can speak with greater authority on the war or the human condition than anyone else. But what will they (be made to) say?","PeriodicalId":187290,"journal":{"name":"The Artist and Journal of Home Culture","volume":"227 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Artist and Journal of Home Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7010010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Disability, especially when war-related, is dangerous ground for entertainment films. Depictions of battle-scarred living bodies are necessarily political, since they cannot avoid commenting on the conflict of which they are a stark visual reminder. Yet depictions are politically multivalent: seeing the disabled has a wide range of effects on audiences. Unsurprisingly, then, disabled survivors of the war have rarely appeared on postwar screens. But the trend of avoiding the messy reality of war-related disability, and disabled bodies more generally, has ended, as the emphatic success of period drama Love and Honor (2006) can attest. In the new century, many films have tackled this once-taboo topic, winning success at the box office or, like Caterpillar (2010), at film festivals. In this article, I analyze depictions of disabled war survivors and other disabled bodies in recent Japanese films, drawing a contrast between Love and Honor and the aforementioned Caterpillar; I explore what motivated this more visceral retelling of both war trauma and general disability, and why each succeeded either commercially or critically. The trend towards depicting disability coincides perfectly with Japanese cinema’s resurgent success against Hollywood. Visceral depictions of traumatized bodies that are symbolically—or literally—disarmed have resonated with domestic audiences, perhaps because disability not only emasculates, it can also empower: the disabled, many believe, can speak with greater authority on the war or the human condition than anyone else. But what will they (be made to) say?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“解除武装”:当代日本电影中的残疾、创伤和阉割
残疾,尤其是与战争有关的残疾,是娱乐电影的危险题材。对战争伤痕累累的活着的身体的描绘必然是政治性的,因为它们无法避免评论冲突,它们是一种鲜明的视觉提醒。然而,这些描述在政治上是多重的:看到残疾人对观众产生了广泛的影响。因此,毫不奇怪,战争的残疾幸存者很少出现在战后的屏幕上。但是,回避与战争有关的残疾,以及更普遍的残疾身体的混乱现实的趋势已经结束,正如历史剧《爱与荣誉》(2006)的巨大成功可以证明的那样。在新世纪,许多电影都触及了这个曾经的禁忌话题,在票房上取得了成功,或者在电影节上取得了成功,比如《卡特彼勒》(Caterpillar, 2010)。在本文中,我分析了最近日本电影中对残疾战争幸存者和其他残疾身体的描绘,并将《爱与荣誉》与前面提到的《毛毛虫》进行了对比;我探讨了是什么促使这种对战争创伤和一般残疾的更发自内心的重述,以及为什么它们都在商业上或评论性上取得了成功。描写残疾的趋势与日本电影对抗好莱坞的复兴成功完全吻合。发自内心地描绘创伤的身体,象征性地——或字面上——解除武装,引起了国内观众的共鸣,也许是因为残疾不仅是阉割,它也可以赋予权力:许多人相信,残疾人在战争或人类状况上比其他人更有权威。但是他们会说什么呢?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Traditional Conservation and Storage Methods for Ancient Chinese Painting and Calligraphy on Silk Manuscripts Street Photography Reframed Becoming Asia’s Art Market Hub: Comparing Singapore and Hong Kong A Relic of Communism, an Architectural Nightmare or a Determinant of the City’s Brand? Media, Political and Architectural Dispute over the Monument to the Revolutionary Act in Rzeszów (Poland) Towards an Embodied Abstraction: An Historical Perspective on Lucinda Childs’ Calico Mingling (1973)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1