Website Evaluation Frameworks: IS oriented vs. Business Oriented Models

H. Keshavarz, M. E. Givi
{"title":"Website Evaluation Frameworks: IS oriented vs. Business Oriented Models","authors":"H. Keshavarz, M. E. Givi","doi":"10.1109/ICWR49608.2020.9122316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several frameworks have been developed to evaluate the websites, especially their quality and credibility. The present study aimed to explore main categories of website evaluation such as source, content, infrastructure, and user. The main differences among the previous frameworks were identified by using a descriptive comparative method. The frameworks were divided into IS-oriented and user-oriented categories, which involved 23 and 6 models, respectively. Based on the findings, the technical aspects of the website were emphasized more in the field of computer sciences. In addition, the quality of the transmission process is discussed from source to audience in the communication discipline. Finally, regarding the field of information science, content and source criteria were considered more compared to other elements.","PeriodicalId":231982,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR)","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWR49608.2020.9122316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Several frameworks have been developed to evaluate the websites, especially their quality and credibility. The present study aimed to explore main categories of website evaluation such as source, content, infrastructure, and user. The main differences among the previous frameworks were identified by using a descriptive comparative method. The frameworks were divided into IS-oriented and user-oriented categories, which involved 23 and 6 models, respectively. Based on the findings, the technical aspects of the website were emphasized more in the field of computer sciences. In addition, the quality of the transmission process is discussed from source to audience in the communication discipline. Finally, regarding the field of information science, content and source criteria were considered more compared to other elements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网站评估框架:面向信息系统与面向业务的模型
已经制定了几个框架来评估网站,特别是它们的质量和信誉。本研究旨在探讨网站评估的主要类别,如来源、内容、基础设施和用户。通过使用描述性比较方法确定了以前框架之间的主要差异。框架分为面向is和面向用户两类,分别涉及23个和6个模型。根据调查结果,网站的技术方面在计算机科学领域得到了更多的强调。此外,传播学从源头到受众对传播过程的质量进行了探讨。最后,在信息科学领域,内容和来源标准比其他因素考虑得更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hierarchical Three-module Method of Text Classification in Web Big Data RePersian:An Efficient Open Information Extraction Tool in Persian Personalization of E-Learning Environment Using the Kolb's Learning Style Model A Multiagent Approach To Web Service Composition Based On TROPOS Methodology Analyzing the Robustness of Web Service Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1