The Impact of STEM Integration on Student Achievement Using HLM: A Case Study

Danielle R. Chine, K. Larwin
{"title":"The Impact of STEM Integration on Student Achievement Using HLM: A Case Study","authors":"Danielle R. Chine, K. Larwin","doi":"10.51355/jstem.2022.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study’s purpose was to determine the effectiveness of a science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) program in an urban, Ohio middle school. The definition of integrated STEM education along with curriculum, standards, and implementation models are described. Participants in this longitudinal, quantitative study were all students enrolled in grades 7-8 beginning in 2012-2013 and continuing for seven years. Per grade level for any given year, there were 25-28 participants receiving the treatment by voluntary enrollment in an integrated STEM education program (containing STEM curriculum and applying pedagogies of project-based learning) and 350-425 control participants receiving general education (defined as traditional and lacking both project-based learning and STEM curriculum). We sought to determine if participation in an integrated STEM education program had an impact on student achievement (measured by Ohio State Test scores) and, if any, interaction effects due to gender, socioeconomic status, student race, and attendance rate were present. The use of hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) determined integrated STEM education had a significant, positive effect on achievement combining math and science (participants scoring 31.8 points higher on average) and in science only (participants scoring 38.2 points higher on average) compared to control participants, respectively. No interaction effects were found. These findings pose strong implications for educational leaders in making teacher training and curriculum decisions with the aim of increasing student achievement.","PeriodicalId":252126,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in STEM Education","volume":"72 4 Pt 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in STEM Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2022.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study’s purpose was to determine the effectiveness of a science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) program in an urban, Ohio middle school. The definition of integrated STEM education along with curriculum, standards, and implementation models are described. Participants in this longitudinal, quantitative study were all students enrolled in grades 7-8 beginning in 2012-2013 and continuing for seven years. Per grade level for any given year, there were 25-28 participants receiving the treatment by voluntary enrollment in an integrated STEM education program (containing STEM curriculum and applying pedagogies of project-based learning) and 350-425 control participants receiving general education (defined as traditional and lacking both project-based learning and STEM curriculum). We sought to determine if participation in an integrated STEM education program had an impact on student achievement (measured by Ohio State Test scores) and, if any, interaction effects due to gender, socioeconomic status, student race, and attendance rate were present. The use of hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) determined integrated STEM education had a significant, positive effect on achievement combining math and science (participants scoring 31.8 points higher on average) and in science only (participants scoring 38.2 points higher on average) compared to control participants, respectively. No interaction effects were found. These findings pose strong implications for educational leaders in making teacher training and curriculum decisions with the aim of increasing student achievement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于HLM的STEM整合对学生成绩的影响:一个案例研究
该研究的目的是确定俄亥俄州一所城市中学的科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)课程的有效性。描述了综合STEM教育的定义以及课程、标准和实施模式。这项纵向定量研究的参与者都是7-8年级的学生,从2012-2013年开始,持续七年。在任何一年的每个年级,有25-28名参与者自愿参加综合STEM教育计划(包含STEM课程和应用基于项目的学习教学法),350-425名对照组参与者接受普通教育(定义为传统的,缺乏基于项目的学习和STEM课程)。我们试图确定参与综合STEM教育计划是否对学生成绩有影响(以俄亥俄州立考试成绩衡量),如果有的话,性别、社会经济地位、学生种族和出勤率是否存在互动影响。层次线性模型(HLM)的使用确定了STEM综合教育对数学和科学(参与者平均得分高31.8分)和科学(参与者平均得分高38.2分)的成绩分别具有显著的积极影响。未发现相互作用效应。这些发现为教育领导者制定教师培训和课程决策提供了强有力的启示,旨在提高学生的成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do STEM teachers have the potential to become leaders in online education? A comic-based conservation lesson plan diversifies middle school student conceptions of scientists Effectiveness of an Inquiry Focused Professional Development: Secondary Mathematics and Science Teachers’ Beliefs and Instruction Pathways to Teacher STEM Certification in Texas: A Case for Addressing the Minority Teacher Shortage Categorizing Classroom-based Argumentation in Elementary STEM Lessons: Applying Walton’s Types of Argument Dialogue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1