Going the distance: Aircraft and lightning, how far is far enough?

Christopher Fuller, F. Heather
{"title":"Going the distance: Aircraft and lightning, how far is far enough?","authors":"Christopher Fuller, F. Heather","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.2016.7571714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the limited data that is available this document serves the purpose to illustrate why aircraft should remain 25 nautical miles (NM) away from thunderstorms. There has been no extensive research on aircraft flying in or near thunderstorms since the 1980s, so data presented is from just normal naturally occurring lightning strikes. The studies show that 95-99% of all lightning strikes are within a 10 NM range; however, while uncommon, there are lightning strikes that can range from 20 to 30 NM [1][2]. Most aircraft agencies stress a 20 to 25 NM distance from thunderstorms. Finally in this paper we take a look at probability and risk estimations for an aircraft being struck by lightning and at what distances from storms is an acceptable level of risk reached. From the risk analysis of the two test cases we can see there are instances that indicate an acceptable level of risk within 25 NM, however it is not until then that a satisfactory level is reached across the board. Because of the studies and the risk assessment provided it seems reasonable why most pilots and aircraft agencies stress a 20 to 25 NM limit for avoiding thunderstorms.","PeriodicalId":326016,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2016.7571714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

With the limited data that is available this document serves the purpose to illustrate why aircraft should remain 25 nautical miles (NM) away from thunderstorms. There has been no extensive research on aircraft flying in or near thunderstorms since the 1980s, so data presented is from just normal naturally occurring lightning strikes. The studies show that 95-99% of all lightning strikes are within a 10 NM range; however, while uncommon, there are lightning strikes that can range from 20 to 30 NM [1][2]. Most aircraft agencies stress a 20 to 25 NM distance from thunderstorms. Finally in this paper we take a look at probability and risk estimations for an aircraft being struck by lightning and at what distances from storms is an acceptable level of risk reached. From the risk analysis of the two test cases we can see there are instances that indicate an acceptable level of risk within 25 NM, however it is not until then that a satisfactory level is reached across the board. Because of the studies and the risk assessment provided it seems reasonable why most pilots and aircraft agencies stress a 20 to 25 NM limit for avoiding thunderstorms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远行:飞机和闪电,多远才算够远?
根据有限的可用数据,本文件的目的是说明为什么飞机应保持25海里(海里)远离雷暴。自20世纪80年代以来,没有对在雷暴中或雷暴附近飞行的飞机进行过广泛的研究,因此所提供的数据只是来自正常的自然发生的雷击。研究表明,95%至99%的雷击发生在10纳米范围内;然而,虽然不常见,但雷击的范围可以从20到30毫微米。大多数飞机机构强调雷暴距离20到25海里。最后,在本文中,我们看一下飞机被闪电击中的概率和风险估计,以及距离风暴的可接受风险水平。从两个测试用例的风险分析中,我们可以看到有些实例表明25 NM内的风险水平是可接受的,但是直到那时才达到令人满意的水平。由于研究和提供的风险评估,这似乎是合理的,为什么大多数飞行员和飞机机构强调20到25海里的限制,以避免雷暴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stable simulation of nonlinearly loaded lossy transmission lines with time marching approach Impact of dynamic power supply noise induced by clock networks on clock jitter and timing margin Full-wave modeling of bulk current injection probe coupling to multi-conductor cable bundles A descriptor form implementation of PEEC models incorporating dispersive and lossy dielectrics Time domain measurement of shielded cables with connectors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1