Comparison of caudal ketamine with lidocaine or tramadol administration for postoperative analgesia of hypospadias surgery in children.

M. Gunduz, M. Ozalevli, H. Ozbek, D. Ozcengiz
{"title":"Comparison of caudal ketamine with lidocaine or tramadol administration for postoperative analgesia of hypospadias surgery in children.","authors":"M. Gunduz, M. Ozalevli, H. Ozbek, D. Ozcengiz","doi":"10.1097/00003643-200505001-00525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThis study was designed to investigate whether the addition of tramadol or lidocaine to ketamine would enhance the quality of intra- and postoperative analgesia for hypospadias surgery in children.\n\n\nMETHODS\nSixty-two ASA PS I or II children, between 1 and 10 years of age, scheduled for hypospadias surgery were recruited. Anesthesia was induced with 6-8% sevoflurane and maintained with 0.5-2.5% sevoflurane-50% N2O in oxygen. Children were allocated randomly to receive one of two study drugs. Children in group KL received caudal ketamine (0.25 mg.kg(-1)) plus lidocaine (2%, 2 mg.kg(-1)) and in group KT ketamine (0.25 mg.kg(-1)) plus tramadol (1 mg.kg(-1)). Systemic blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral O2 saturation, sedation, and pain scores (CHEOPS) were recorded at 1, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 min and 1, 2, 3 h following recovery from anesthesia.\n\n\nRESULTS\nDuration of analgesia was similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). CHEOPS in group KL was lower than in group KT during the study period, except at first 15 min. Sedation scores were higher in group KL than group KT in the first 10 min (P < 0.05). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was similar in the two groups (P > 0.05) Sevoflurane concentration required was significantly lower in group KL than group KT peroperatively (P < 0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nCaudal ketamine (0.25 mg.kg(-1)), plus lidocaine (2% 2 mg.kg(-1)) significantly reduced sevoflurane concentration compared with ketamine (0.25 mg.kg(-1)) + tramadol (1 mg.kg(-1)). We suggested that both ketamine + lidocaine and ketamine + tramadol provided very effective and long duration of analgesia, similarly. However, analgesia quality is superior in the ketamine-lidocaine group postoperatively.","PeriodicalId":281130,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric anaesthesia","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00003643-200505001-00525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study was designed to investigate whether the addition of tramadol or lidocaine to ketamine would enhance the quality of intra- and postoperative analgesia for hypospadias surgery in children. METHODS Sixty-two ASA PS I or II children, between 1 and 10 years of age, scheduled for hypospadias surgery were recruited. Anesthesia was induced with 6-8% sevoflurane and maintained with 0.5-2.5% sevoflurane-50% N2O in oxygen. Children were allocated randomly to receive one of two study drugs. Children in group KL received caudal ketamine (0.25 mg.kg(-1)) plus lidocaine (2%, 2 mg.kg(-1)) and in group KT ketamine (0.25 mg.kg(-1)) plus tramadol (1 mg.kg(-1)). Systemic blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral O2 saturation, sedation, and pain scores (CHEOPS) were recorded at 1, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 min and 1, 2, 3 h following recovery from anesthesia. RESULTS Duration of analgesia was similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). CHEOPS in group KL was lower than in group KT during the study period, except at first 15 min. Sedation scores were higher in group KL than group KT in the first 10 min (P < 0.05). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was similar in the two groups (P > 0.05) Sevoflurane concentration required was significantly lower in group KL than group KT peroperatively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Caudal ketamine (0.25 mg.kg(-1)), plus lidocaine (2% 2 mg.kg(-1)) significantly reduced sevoflurane concentration compared with ketamine (0.25 mg.kg(-1)) + tramadol (1 mg.kg(-1)). We suggested that both ketamine + lidocaine and ketamine + tramadol provided very effective and long duration of analgesia, similarly. However, analgesia quality is superior in the ketamine-lidocaine group postoperatively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氯胺酮与利多卡因或曲马多在小儿尿道下裂术后镇痛中的比较。
本研究旨在探讨曲马多或利多卡因加入氯胺酮是否会提高儿童尿道下裂手术的术中和术后镇痛质量。方法招募62名年龄在1 ~ 10岁的ASA PS I或II级儿童,计划行尿道下裂手术。麻醉用6-8%七氟醚诱导,0.5-2.5%七氟醚-50% N2O氧维持。儿童被随机分配接受两种研究药物中的一种。KL组儿童尾服氯胺酮(0.25 mg.kg(-1))加利多卡因(2%,2 mg.kg(-1)), KT组氯胺酮(0.25 mg.kg(-1))加曲马多(1 mg.kg(-1))。分别于麻醉恢复后1、5、10、15、30、45分钟和1、2、3小时记录全身血压、心率、外周氧饱和度、镇静和疼痛评分(CHEOPS)。结果两组患者镇痛时间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。除前15 min外,KL组的CHEOPS均低于KT组。KL组的镇静评分在前10 min均高于KT组(P < 0.05)。两组术后恶心、呕吐发生率相似(P < 0.05), KL组术前所需七氟醚浓度显著低于KT组(P < 0.001)。结论与氯胺酮(0.25 mg.kg(-1)) +曲马多(1 mg.kg(-1))相比,口服氯胺酮(0.25 mg.kg) +利多卡因(2% 2 mg.kg(-1))可显著降低七氟醚浓度。我们认为氯胺酮+利多卡因和氯胺酮+曲马多都能提供非常有效和持续时间长的镇痛。但氯胺酮-利多卡因组术后镇痛质量较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The delivery and challenges of Pediatric Anesthesia within the humanitarian sector: Médecins Sans Frontières and Mercy Ships. Evaluation of parental anxiety following three methods of pre-anesthesia counseling: Video, brochure and verbal communication. Perioperative management and outcomes for posterior spinal fusion in patients with Friedreich ataxia: A single-center, retrospective study. Pediatric anesthesia in Australia and New Zealand and health inequity among First Nations and Māori children. Advances in pediatric anesthesia services over the past 10 years in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1