Liberal Democracy in a Less-than-Liberal Context? The Case of Contemporary Greece

Dimitris A. Sotiropoulos
{"title":"Liberal Democracy in a Less-than-Liberal Context? The Case of Contemporary Greece","authors":"Dimitris A. Sotiropoulos","doi":"10.53483/wckx3545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The persistence of democracy in today’s Greece may be surprising for two reasons. First, liberal democracy survived an economic crisis in the 2010s that was more severe than the Great Depression of the 1930s. Second, liberal democracy has remained stable despite the fact that the period since the 1974 transition from the Colonels’ Regime has witnessed the diffusion of illiberal ideas and an emergence of relatively small yet very active antiliberal parties. Liberal democracy has been resilient in the face of nationalism and populism, even though accountable liberal institutions enjoy limited political trust. The resilience of contemporary Greek democracy can be explained through two sets of factors: a political set and a social set. Political factors include a long history of political liberalism and the robustness of contemporary political-party competition. Social factors include Greece’s relatively large middle class and the absence of overlapping  social cleavages that could otherwise have led to destructive socio-political polarization and then a slide toward illiberalism. The Greek case shows under what conditions a liberal democracy can flourish in a less-than-liberal context.","PeriodicalId":370884,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Illiberalism Studies","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Illiberalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53483/wckx3545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The persistence of democracy in today’s Greece may be surprising for two reasons. First, liberal democracy survived an economic crisis in the 2010s that was more severe than the Great Depression of the 1930s. Second, liberal democracy has remained stable despite the fact that the period since the 1974 transition from the Colonels’ Regime has witnessed the diffusion of illiberal ideas and an emergence of relatively small yet very active antiliberal parties. Liberal democracy has been resilient in the face of nationalism and populism, even though accountable liberal institutions enjoy limited political trust. The resilience of contemporary Greek democracy can be explained through two sets of factors: a political set and a social set. Political factors include a long history of political liberalism and the robustness of contemporary political-party competition. Social factors include Greece’s relatively large middle class and the absence of overlapping  social cleavages that could otherwise have led to destructive socio-political polarization and then a slide toward illiberalism. The Greek case shows under what conditions a liberal democracy can flourish in a less-than-liberal context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非自由背景下的自由民主?当代希腊的情况
在今天的希腊,民主制度的持续可能令人惊讶,原因有二。首先,自由民主挺过了2010年代比上世纪30年代大萧条(Great Depression)更严重的经济危机。其次,尽管自1974年从上校政权过渡以来,非自由主义思想的扩散和相对较小但非常活跃的反自由主义政党的出现,但自由民主仍然保持稳定。面对民族主义和民粹主义,自由民主一直具有弹性,尽管负责任的自由机构享有有限的政治信任。当代希腊民主的韧性可以通过两组因素来解释:政治因素和社会因素。政治因素包括政治自由主义的悠久历史和当代政党竞争的激烈程度。社会因素包括希腊相对庞大的中产阶级和没有重叠的社会分裂,否则这些分裂可能导致破坏性的社会政治两极分化,然后滑向非自由主义。希腊的例子表明,在什么条件下,自由民主才能在不那么自由的环境中蓬勃发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patriarch Kirill’s Praetorian Guard: Sorok Sorokov as Radical Outreach for “Holy Tradition” The Phantasmatic Dimension of Culture Wars: The Case of Social Conservatism Owning and Disowning the Female Body: Mediating Gender and the Conservative Values Clash in Kazakhstan Documents Accuse: The Post-Soviet Memory Politics of Genocide The Spanish and French Far Rights in Their Quest for a New Traditionalist Order
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1