Legal Problems Regarding the Implementation of the Obligation to Read the Notary Deed

Hendy Hendariyadi, Jawade Hafidz, Soegianto Soegianto
{"title":"Legal Problems Regarding the Implementation of the Obligation to Read the Notary Deed","authors":"Hendy Hendariyadi, Jawade Hafidz, Soegianto Soegianto","doi":"10.30659/AKTA.V7I4.14102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading the deed is an obligation in every authentic deed is made, the reading of the deed by a notary is part of the verlijden or the inauguration of the reading and signing of the deed in question. If the reading of this deed is related to the making of an authentic deed which is part of perfect proof, it is clear that making a notary deed requires the real presence and physical position of the parties concerned. The purpose of this research is to analyze the Notary Public is obliged to read out the deed made based on Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public, To analyze the legal problems of reading deeds made by the Notary, To analyze the legal consequences of deeds that are not read by a Notary based on Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of a Notary Public. The method used in this research is the method used in this research is juridical empirical, namely an approach based on applicable law and based on reality in practice. The juridical approach is used to analyze regulations that are related to the Notary Law, while the empirical approach is used to analyze the obligations of notaries in reading deeds which are seen as community behavior that has a pattern in community life that always interacts and relates to social aspects. namely an approach based on applicable law and based on reality in practice. The juridical approach is used to analyze regulations that are related to the Notary Law, while the empirical approach is used to analyze the obligations of notaries in reading deeds which are seen as community behavior that has a pattern in community life that always interacts and relates to social aspects. namely an approach based on applicable law and based on reality in practice. The juridical approach is used to analyze regulations that are related to the Notary Law, while the empirical approach is used to analyze the obligations of notaries in reading deeds which are seen as community behavior that has a pattern in community life that always interacts and relates to social aspects.The legal problem of reading deeds made by notaries, related to article 16 paragraph 7 of the Law on Notary Position regulates deviations from article 16 letter m. Where in Article 16 paragraph 7, it is stated that the reading of the deed is not mandatory, if the viewer wants the deed not to be read because the viewer has read it himself, knows and understands its contents, provided that it is stated in the cover of the deed and also on every minuta deed page initialed by the parties, and witnesses, as well as a notary. The legal consequence of the deed which is not read out by the notary based on Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public, the deed which is not read out is still an authentic deed as long as the reasons for not reading the deed are stated.","PeriodicalId":190203,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akta","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/AKTA.V7I4.14102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading the deed is an obligation in every authentic deed is made, the reading of the deed by a notary is part of the verlijden or the inauguration of the reading and signing of the deed in question. If the reading of this deed is related to the making of an authentic deed which is part of perfect proof, it is clear that making a notary deed requires the real presence and physical position of the parties concerned. The purpose of this research is to analyze the Notary Public is obliged to read out the deed made based on Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public, To analyze the legal problems of reading deeds made by the Notary, To analyze the legal consequences of deeds that are not read by a Notary based on Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of a Notary Public. The method used in this research is the method used in this research is juridical empirical, namely an approach based on applicable law and based on reality in practice. The juridical approach is used to analyze regulations that are related to the Notary Law, while the empirical approach is used to analyze the obligations of notaries in reading deeds which are seen as community behavior that has a pattern in community life that always interacts and relates to social aspects. namely an approach based on applicable law and based on reality in practice. The juridical approach is used to analyze regulations that are related to the Notary Law, while the empirical approach is used to analyze the obligations of notaries in reading deeds which are seen as community behavior that has a pattern in community life that always interacts and relates to social aspects. namely an approach based on applicable law and based on reality in practice. The juridical approach is used to analyze regulations that are related to the Notary Law, while the empirical approach is used to analyze the obligations of notaries in reading deeds which are seen as community behavior that has a pattern in community life that always interacts and relates to social aspects.The legal problem of reading deeds made by notaries, related to article 16 paragraph 7 of the Law on Notary Position regulates deviations from article 16 letter m. Where in Article 16 paragraph 7, it is stated that the reading of the deed is not mandatory, if the viewer wants the deed not to be read because the viewer has read it himself, knows and understands its contents, provided that it is stated in the cover of the deed and also on every minuta deed page initialed by the parties, and witnesses, as well as a notary. The legal consequence of the deed which is not read out by the notary based on Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public, the deed which is not read out is still an authentic deed as long as the reasons for not reading the deed are stated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于履行宣读公证书义务的法律问题
在每一份真实的契约中,阅读契约是一项义务,由公证人阅读契约是有关契约的阅读和签署的开始或开始的一部分。如果本契约的阅读与制作真实的契约有关,而真实的契约是完美证明的一部分,那么很明显,制作公证契约需要有关各方的真实存在和身体位置。本研究的目的是分析公证员有义务宣读基于2014年第2号法案关于公证员地位的契约,分析阅读公证员契约的法律问题,分析基于2014年第2号法案关于公证员地位的公证员未宣读契约的法律后果。本研究采用的方法是司法实证的方法,即以适用法律为依据,以实践中的实际为依据的方法。本文采用司法方法分析与《公证法》相关的法规,采用实证方法分析公证员在阅读契约中的义务。公证员的阅读契约被视为一种社区行为,在社区生活中具有一定的模式,总是与社会方面相互作用和联系。即以适用法律为依据,以实践实际为依据。本文采用司法方法分析与《公证法》相关的法规,采用实证方法分析公证员在阅读契约中的义务。公证员的阅读契约被视为一种社区行为,在社区生活中具有一定的模式,总是与社会方面相互作用和联系。即以适用法律为依据,以实践实际为依据。本文采用司法方法分析与《公证法》相关的法规,采用实证方法分析公证员在阅读契约中的义务。公证员的阅读契约被视为一种社区行为,在社区生活中具有一定的模式,总是与社会方面相互作用和联系。阅读行为的法律问题由公证人,第十六条7款相关法律公证位置调节偏离第十六条字母m。在第十六条7款,这是说的阅读行为并不是强制性的,如果观众想要的行为不能阅读,因为观众阅读它自己,知道并理解其内容,只要它是在契约的封面和每minuta契约当事人签字页,还有证人,还有公证人。根据2014年第2号关于公证人地位的法案,未经公证人宣读的契约的法律后果,只要说明不宣读契约的原因,未宣读的契约仍然是真实的契约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Re-Narrate the Relevance of Justice in Debtor Protection Related to the Parate Execution Carried Out by Separatist Creditors The Predatory Pricing Practice: The Challenges of Business Competition Law on Ride-Hailing Tariff’s War The Legal Implications of Forgery Sale & Purchase Binding Agreement by Notary Public The Implementation of Legal Position Regulation of Head of Services/Agency in Local Government The Implementation of a Complete Systematic Land Registration Program to Realize Legal Protection and Public Welfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1