Can Technological Change Weaken the Robustness of Common-Property Regimes?

Maija Halonen-Akatwijuka, Evagelos Pafilis
{"title":"Can Technological Change Weaken the Robustness of Common-Property Regimes?","authors":"Maija Halonen-Akatwijuka, Evagelos Pafilis","doi":"10.1017/9781108938617.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the effect of technological change on the incentives to cooperate in the provision of common-pool resources (CPRs). We focus our analysis on CPRs that require investments in improvement and maintenance, such as irrigation systems. We find that major technological improvements, such as replacing a primitive irrigation system with a modern system, risk compromising cooperation as the temptation to freeride on other farmers’ investments is increased. By contrast, minor technological improvements within an existing irrigation system, such as strengthening water diversion devices, do not hinder incentives to cooperate. In our analysis, an irrigation system can be well-managed for a long period of time during technological progress when changes are minor. When technology changes are major, cooperation can be maintained if the community is patient and initially their discount factor is well above the critical level for cooperation. However, when the threshold is reached, any further major technological improvement will lead to a breakdown of cooperation and collapse of investments in the irrigation system.","PeriodicalId":438499,"journal":{"name":"The Cambridge Handbook of Commons Research Innovations","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cambridge Handbook of Commons Research Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108938617.034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine the effect of technological change on the incentives to cooperate in the provision of common-pool resources (CPRs). We focus our analysis on CPRs that require investments in improvement and maintenance, such as irrigation systems. We find that major technological improvements, such as replacing a primitive irrigation system with a modern system, risk compromising cooperation as the temptation to freeride on other farmers’ investments is increased. By contrast, minor technological improvements within an existing irrigation system, such as strengthening water diversion devices, do not hinder incentives to cooperate. In our analysis, an irrigation system can be well-managed for a long period of time during technological progress when changes are minor. When technology changes are major, cooperation can be maintained if the community is patient and initially their discount factor is well above the critical level for cooperation. However, when the threshold is reached, any further major technological improvement will lead to a breakdown of cooperation and collapse of investments in the irrigation system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术变革会削弱共有财产制度的稳健性吗?
我们研究了技术变革对共同资源(CPRs)提供合作激励的影响。我们将分析重点放在需要投资改善和维护的CPRs上,例如灌溉系统。我们发现,重大的技术改进,例如用现代灌溉系统取代原始灌溉系统,有可能损害合作,因为搭便车的诱惑增加了其他农民的投资。相比之下,在现有灌溉系统内进行微小的技术改进,例如加强引水装置,并不妨碍鼓励合作。在我们的分析中,在技术进步过程中,当变化很小时,灌溉系统可以在很长一段时间内得到良好的管理。当技术发生重大变化时,如果社区有耐心,并且最初的折扣系数远高于合作的临界水平,合作就可以维持。然而,一旦达到这个门槛,任何进一步的重大技术改进都将导致合作的中断和灌溉系统投资的崩溃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of Facilitated Common Pool Resources in India Ostromian Logic Applied to Civil Society Organizations and the Rules That Shape Them New Forms of Contested Commons Can Affirmative Action Offer a Lesson in Fighting Enclosure? Humanitarian Aid as a Shared and Contested Common Resource
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1