Deriving Competency-Based Evaluation Criteria for Ethics Assignments in Computer Science

Marie Schröder, Gregor Große-Bölting, A. Mühling
{"title":"Deriving Competency-Based Evaluation Criteria for Ethics Assignments in Computer Science","authors":"Marie Schröder, Gregor Große-Bölting, A. Mühling","doi":"10.1145/3564721.3564744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discussion of the social responsibility of computer scientists and the ethical implications of computer science has, at the latest since the 1970s, been part of computer science curricula. Especially in recent years, the discussion about ethics in computer science has gained new momentum, due to the trending topics of AI and machine learning. The increased attention is also reflected in an expansion of teaching, which in turn creates a need for established teaching materials and assessment standards. This theoretical short paper presents the theory-driven and competency-based development of such evaluation criteria for the final exam performance of an “Ethics in Computer Science” course. The particular challenges of such an interdisciplinary endeavor are discussed, as well as the need for a transparent assessment standard in light of different subject cultures between computer science and philosophy. In addition to deriving the assessment items, the complete instrument is provided as part of our paper.","PeriodicalId":149708,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564721.3564744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The discussion of the social responsibility of computer scientists and the ethical implications of computer science has, at the latest since the 1970s, been part of computer science curricula. Especially in recent years, the discussion about ethics in computer science has gained new momentum, due to the trending topics of AI and machine learning. The increased attention is also reflected in an expansion of teaching, which in turn creates a need for established teaching materials and assessment standards. This theoretical short paper presents the theory-driven and competency-based development of such evaluation criteria for the final exam performance of an “Ethics in Computer Science” course. The particular challenges of such an interdisciplinary endeavor are discussed, as well as the need for a transparent assessment standard in light of different subject cultures between computer science and philosophy. In addition to deriving the assessment items, the complete instrument is provided as part of our paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于能力的计算机科学伦理作业评价标准的推导
自20世纪70年代以来,关于计算机科学家的社会责任和计算机科学的伦理含义的讨论已经成为计算机科学课程的一部分。特别是近年来,由于人工智能和机器学习的热门话题,关于计算机科学伦理的讨论获得了新的动力。这种日益重视也反映在教学的扩大上,这反过来又需要制订教材和评价标准。这篇理论短文介绍了“计算机科学伦理”课程期末考试成绩评估标准的理论驱动和基于能力的发展。讨论了这种跨学科努力的特殊挑战,以及在计算机科学和哲学之间不同学科文化的基础上需要一个透明的评估标准。除了导出评估项目外,本文还提供了完整的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining the Use of Computational Thinking Skills When Solving Bebras Tasks Trends From Computing Education Research Conferences: Increasing Submissions and Decreasing Acceptance Rates An Algorithm for Generating Explainable Corrections to Student Code High School Students’ Sense-making of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning The Impact of Solving Adaptive Parsons Problems with Common and Uncommon Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1