ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENTS: WHERE TEACHING ENDS AND LEARNING BEGINS

R. Elbakly, M. Ibrahim
{"title":"ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENTS: WHERE TEACHING ENDS AND LEARNING BEGINS","authors":"R. Elbakly, M. Ibrahim","doi":"10.54729/2789-8547.1076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Architecture is a fast changing domain. Nevertheless, architectural education in Egypt can often not keep pace with those fast changes. Namely, graduate students start to realize that there are practical experiences like dealing with clients, working in large teams and acquiring knowledge related to architectural software independently which they do not obtain in undergraduate years, but wish that they did! This raises the question of how far should the architecture educational process change from Teaching to Learning ?As a matter of fact, the educational process at any architectural department is defined to a very high extent by the physical attributes of the department's spaces. Educational environments created by both, the physical interior and the educational method are assumed to be responsible for students completely adhering to academic content and not being able to acquire new knowledge independently, innovate and develop the necessary work competencies. Therefore, the department of architecture at the Faculty of Engineering (University of Alexandria) is taken as a study case. A questionnaire among fresh graduate students is carried out to obtain feedback concerning the education provided. Meanwhile, a field survey is conducted to assess the most important key features of the department's physical space which affect the educational process as revealed through literature review. Finally the paper compares survey findings with questionnaire results and recommends a set of physical and educational changes to be made in order for shifting the educational process to be more learning-oriented at the department subjected to study.","PeriodicalId":113089,"journal":{"name":"Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54729/2789-8547.1076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Architecture is a fast changing domain. Nevertheless, architectural education in Egypt can often not keep pace with those fast changes. Namely, graduate students start to realize that there are practical experiences like dealing with clients, working in large teams and acquiring knowledge related to architectural software independently which they do not obtain in undergraduate years, but wish that they did! This raises the question of how far should the architecture educational process change from Teaching to Learning ?As a matter of fact, the educational process at any architectural department is defined to a very high extent by the physical attributes of the department's spaces. Educational environments created by both, the physical interior and the educational method are assumed to be responsible for students completely adhering to academic content and not being able to acquire new knowledge independently, innovate and develop the necessary work competencies. Therefore, the department of architecture at the Faculty of Engineering (University of Alexandria) is taken as a study case. A questionnaire among fresh graduate students is carried out to obtain feedback concerning the education provided. Meanwhile, a field survey is conducted to assess the most important key features of the department's physical space which affect the educational process as revealed through literature review. Finally the paper compares survey findings with questionnaire results and recommends a set of physical and educational changes to be made in order for shifting the educational process to be more learning-oriented at the department subjected to study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑教育环境:教的结束,学的开始
抽象架构是一个快速变化的领域。然而,埃及的建筑教育往往跟不上这些快速变化的步伐。也就是说,研究生们开始意识到,像与客户打交道、在大型团队中工作、独立获得与建筑软件相关的知识等实践经验是他们在本科阶段没有获得的,但他们希望自己能够获得!这就提出了一个问题,建筑教育的过程应该从“教”向“学”转变到什么程度?事实上,任何建筑部门的教育过程在很大程度上都是由该部门空间的物理属性来定义的。由物理内部和教育方法创造的教育环境被认为是导致学生完全坚持学术内容,无法独立获取新知识,创新和发展必要的工作能力的原因。因此,以亚历山大大学工程学院建筑系为研究案例。对应届研究生进行问卷调查,以获得对所提供教育的反馈。同时,我们进行了实地调查,以评估通过文献综述揭示的影响教育过程的部门物理空间最重要的关键特征。最后,本文将调查结果与问卷调查结果进行比较,并提出了一套体育和教育方面的改革建议,以使受研究部门的教育过程更加以学习为导向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REVIVING CULTURAL HERITAGE IDENTITY IN HISTORICAL AREAS THROUGH LEFTOVER SPACES – APPLICATION OF A CULTURAL PARK IN ABU ALI RIVER REGION, TRIPOLI, LEBANON EXPLORING SPATIAL CONFIGURATION FOR EFFECTIVE WAY-FINDING IN THE DESIGN OF SHOPPING MALLS IN ABUJA - NIGERIA GENERATING A DESIGN AUTOMATION FOR FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP IN RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: DEVELOPING PLUG IN PARAMETRIC DESIGN AS A TOOL TO REDUCE SOLAR PENETRATION BY OUTDOOR SHADES IN HOT ARID CLIMATE BIM-GIS INTEGRATION AN INNOVATIVE TOOL TO ENHANCE URBAN HERITAGE MANAGEMENT IN THE DIGITAL ERA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1