A standardised data acquisition process model for digital forensic investigations

R. Montasari
{"title":"A standardised data acquisition process model for digital forensic investigations","authors":"R. Montasari","doi":"10.1504/IJICS.2017.10005908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Similar to traditional evidence, courts of law do not assume that digital evidence is reliable if there is no evidence of some empirical testing regarding the theories and techniques pertaining to its production. Courts take a careful notice of the way in which digital evidence has been acquired and stored. In contrast with traditional crimes for which there are well-established standards and procedures upon which courts can rely, there are no formal procedures or models for digital data acquisition to which courts of law can refer. A standardised data acquisition process model is needed to enable digital forensic investigators to follow a uniform approach, and to assist courts of law in determining the reliability of digital evidence presented to them. This paper proposes a model that is standardised in that it can enable digital forensic investigators in following a uniform approach, and that is generic in that it can be applied in both law enforcement and corporate investigations. To carry out the research presented in the paper, the design science research process (DSRP) methodology proposed by Peffers et al. (2006) has been followed.","PeriodicalId":164016,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Inf. Comput. Secur.","volume":"47 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Inf. Comput. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICS.2017.10005908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Similar to traditional evidence, courts of law do not assume that digital evidence is reliable if there is no evidence of some empirical testing regarding the theories and techniques pertaining to its production. Courts take a careful notice of the way in which digital evidence has been acquired and stored. In contrast with traditional crimes for which there are well-established standards and procedures upon which courts can rely, there are no formal procedures or models for digital data acquisition to which courts of law can refer. A standardised data acquisition process model is needed to enable digital forensic investigators to follow a uniform approach, and to assist courts of law in determining the reliability of digital evidence presented to them. This paper proposes a model that is standardised in that it can enable digital forensic investigators in following a uniform approach, and that is generic in that it can be applied in both law enforcement and corporate investigations. To carry out the research presented in the paper, the design science research process (DSRP) methodology proposed by Peffers et al. (2006) has been followed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于数字取证调查的标准化数据采集过程模型
与传统证据类似,如果没有证据表明与数字证据的产生有关的理论和技术进行了一些经验检验,法院就不会假设数字证据是可靠的。法院会仔细注意数字证据的获取和存储方式。传统犯罪有法院可以依赖的既定标准和程序,与之相反,没有法院可以参考的数字数据获取的正式程序或模型。需要一个标准化的数据采集过程模型,使数字法医调查员能够采用统一的方法,并协助法院确定提交给他们的数字证据的可靠性。本文提出的模型是标准化的,因为它可以使数字法医调查员遵循统一的方法,并且是通用的,因为它可以应用于执法和公司调查。为了开展本文中提出的研究,遵循了Peffers等人(2006)提出的设计科学研究过程(DSRP)方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vulnerability discovery modelling: a general framework Modelling and visualising SSH brute force attack behaviours through a hybrid learning framework Empirical risk assessment of attack graphs using time to compromise framework Fault-based testing for discovering SQL injection vulnerabilities in web applications Leveraging Intel SGX to enable trusted and privacy preserving membership service in distributed ledgers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1