The combination of the MOORA method and the Copeland Score method as a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) Vendor Selection

Aulia Pasca Sahida, B. Surarso, R. Gernowo
{"title":"The combination of the MOORA method and the Copeland Score method as a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) Vendor Selection","authors":"Aulia Pasca Sahida, B. Surarso, R. Gernowo","doi":"10.1109/ISRITI48646.2019.9034579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of the right vendor is crucial for the success and competitiveness of manufacturing organizations. Vendor selection decision making has a wide scope and a high level of complexity, which is due to the involvement of various decision makers who have their own preferences. The involvement of various decision makers with their respective preferences, also causes differences in priority over the criteria used. In this paper, it is proposed to use the concept of Group Decision Support System (GDSS) to determine the best vendor based on the aggregation of the preferences of each decision maker. The proposed GDSS concept is to combine the Multi-Objective Optimization method on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) with the Copeland Score method. The MOORA method is used as a ranking method based on the criteria and weight ratio of each decision maker. The results of ranking using the MOORA method each decision maker is then aggregated using the Copeland Score method, to get the final vendor ranking. The results show that Alternative 5 (Yogatama) has the highest score, so it is ranked first and shows as the best alternative. Sensitivity analysis showed that the proposed GDSS concept was solid, with a low percentage of change.","PeriodicalId":367363,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRITI48646.2019.9034579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The selection of the right vendor is crucial for the success and competitiveness of manufacturing organizations. Vendor selection decision making has a wide scope and a high level of complexity, which is due to the involvement of various decision makers who have their own preferences. The involvement of various decision makers with their respective preferences, also causes differences in priority over the criteria used. In this paper, it is proposed to use the concept of Group Decision Support System (GDSS) to determine the best vendor based on the aggregation of the preferences of each decision maker. The proposed GDSS concept is to combine the Multi-Objective Optimization method on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) with the Copeland Score method. The MOORA method is used as a ranking method based on the criteria and weight ratio of each decision maker. The results of ranking using the MOORA method each decision maker is then aggregated using the Copeland Score method, to get the final vendor ranking. The results show that Alternative 5 (Yogatama) has the highest score, so it is ranked first and shows as the best alternative. Sensitivity analysis showed that the proposed GDSS concept was solid, with a low percentage of change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合MOORA方法和Copeland评分方法作为群体决策支持系统(GDSS)供应商选择
选择合适的供应商对制造企业的成功和竞争力至关重要。供应商选择决策具有广泛的范围和高度的复杂性,这是由于各种决策者的参与,他们有自己的偏好。不同的决策者以他们各自的偏好参与其中,也造成了对所使用标准的优先次序的差异。本文提出了利用群体决策支持系统(Group Decision Support System, GDSS)的概念,通过汇总各决策者的偏好来确定最佳供应商。本文提出的GDSS概念是将基于Ratio Analysis (MOORA)的多目标优化方法与Copeland Score方法相结合。采用MOORA法根据各决策者的标准和权重比进行排序。使用MOORA方法进行排名的结果,然后使用Copeland Score方法对每个决策者进行汇总,以获得最终的供应商排名。结果显示,选择5 (Yogatama)得分最高,因此排名第一,显示为最佳选择。敏感性分析表明,提出的GDSS概念是可靠的,具有低百分比的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TrendiTex: An Intelligent Fashion Designer Pair Extraction of Aspect and Implicit Opinion Word based on its Co-occurrence in Corpus of Bahasa Indonesia Parameter Tuning of G-mapping SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) on Mobile Robot with Laser-Range Finder 360° Sensor ISRITI 2019 Committees Network Architecture Design of Indonesia Research and Education Network (IDREN)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1