Experimental Evaluation of a Wavy Trailing Edge Cooling Design as an Alternative to Pressure Side Cutback Cooling

Izhar Ullah, Timothy A. Burdett, L. Wright, Je-Chin Han, C. Lee
{"title":"Experimental Evaluation of a Wavy Trailing Edge Cooling Design as an Alternative to Pressure Side Cutback Cooling","authors":"Izhar Ullah, Timothy A. Burdett, L. Wright, Je-Chin Han, C. Lee","doi":"10.1115/gt2022-78286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study measures the film cooling effectiveness along the trailing edge of a turbine blade in a linear cascade. The film cooling effectiveness is measured and analyzed using the pressure sensitive paint (PSP) technique. Two different trailing edge designs are investigated including the standard pressure side cutback and the new alternating discharge design (referred to as a wavy trailing edge design). The alternating discharge design is a new design with a wavy structure between the pressure and suction surfaces at the trailing edge. The new wavy structure allows the coolant to discharge from the trailing edge so that it alternates between the pressure and suction surfaces. Testing is carried out in a five-blade, linear, steady state cascade with inlet and exit Mach numbers of 0.20 and 0.30, respectively. The freestream turbulence intensity is measured to be 10.5% upstream of the blade leading edge. Coolant-to-mainstream mass flow ratios (MFR) vary from 0.30% to 1.25% and coolant to mainstream density ratios (DR) of 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 are examined. The total pressure loss coefficients are also acquired to compare the aerodynamic loss between the two trailing edge designs. The pressure loss coefficient is acquired by traversing a group of pitot static probes across the blade span in a plane downstream of the trailing edge, resulting in a pressure map at the exit plane. A positive MFR and DR effect is witnessed with almost no change in aerodynamic loss. The results provide the potential of the alternating discharge as a promising trailing edge design and provide gas turbine designers with an improved trailing edge cooling scheme having acceptable aerodynamic loss.","PeriodicalId":267158,"journal":{"name":"Volume 6A: Heat Transfer — Combustors; Film Cooling","volume":"655 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 6A: Heat Transfer — Combustors; Film Cooling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2022-78286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study measures the film cooling effectiveness along the trailing edge of a turbine blade in a linear cascade. The film cooling effectiveness is measured and analyzed using the pressure sensitive paint (PSP) technique. Two different trailing edge designs are investigated including the standard pressure side cutback and the new alternating discharge design (referred to as a wavy trailing edge design). The alternating discharge design is a new design with a wavy structure between the pressure and suction surfaces at the trailing edge. The new wavy structure allows the coolant to discharge from the trailing edge so that it alternates between the pressure and suction surfaces. Testing is carried out in a five-blade, linear, steady state cascade with inlet and exit Mach numbers of 0.20 and 0.30, respectively. The freestream turbulence intensity is measured to be 10.5% upstream of the blade leading edge. Coolant-to-mainstream mass flow ratios (MFR) vary from 0.30% to 1.25% and coolant to mainstream density ratios (DR) of 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 are examined. The total pressure loss coefficients are also acquired to compare the aerodynamic loss between the two trailing edge designs. The pressure loss coefficient is acquired by traversing a group of pitot static probes across the blade span in a plane downstream of the trailing edge, resulting in a pressure map at the exit plane. A positive MFR and DR effect is witnessed with almost no change in aerodynamic loss. The results provide the potential of the alternating discharge as a promising trailing edge design and provide gas turbine designers with an improved trailing edge cooling scheme having acceptable aerodynamic loss.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波浪尾缘冷却设计替代压力侧切回冷却的实验评估
本文研究了沿线性叶栅涡轮叶片尾缘的气膜冷却效果。采用压敏涂料(PSP)技术对膜层冷却效果进行了测试和分析。研究了两种不同的后缘设计,包括标准压力侧切切和新的交变放电设计(称为波浪后缘设计)。交变排风设计是一种新型的排风设计,在尾缘的压力面和吸力面之间采用波浪状结构。新的波浪结构允许冷却剂从后缘排出,以便在压力面和吸力面之间交替。试验是在进气道和出口马赫数分别为0.20和0.30的五叶片线性稳态叶栅中进行的。自由流湍流强度在叶片前缘上游10.5%处测量。冷却剂与主流的质量流量比(MFR)从0.30%到1.25%不等,冷却剂与主流的密度比(DR)分别为1.0、1.5和2.0。计算了总压损失系数,比较了两种后缘设计的气动损失。压力损失系数是通过在尾缘下游的一个平面上穿过一组皮托管静态探头来获得的,从而得到一个出口平面的压力图。在空气动力损失几乎没有变化的情况下,MFR和DR效应为正。研究结果提供了交替放电作为一种有前途的后缘设计的潜力,并为燃气轮机设计师提供了一种具有可接受气动损失的改进后缘冷却方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wall Curvature Effect on Overall Thermal Performances of Film Cooling Covered by Thermal Barrier Coatings With Various Geometries Film Cooling Hole Shape Effects on Turbine Blade Heat Transfer – Part I: Computational Comparison to Experiment Heat Transfer Coefficient and Adiabatic Effectiveness on a Film-Cooled Pressure Side: Results and Assessment of the IR-Based Measurement Technique Reliability The Cooling Effect of Combustor Exit Louver Scheme on a Transonic Nozzle Guide Vane Endwall Film Cooling Hole Shape Effects on Turbine Blade Heat Transfer – Part II: Effects of Mass Flow Rate and Unsteadiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1