Incorporated Trustees of Digital Rights Lawyers Initiative & Ors v National Identity Management Commission: A Milestone towards a Human Right-Based Approach to Data Protection in Nigeria

Felix Emmanuel
{"title":"Incorporated Trustees of Digital Rights Lawyers Initiative & Ors v National Identity Management Commission: A Milestone towards a Human Right-Based Approach to Data Protection in Nigeria","authors":"Felix Emmanuel","doi":"10.56284/tnjr.v16i1.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 24 September 2021 the Court of Appeal (CA) delivered judgment in Incorporated Trustees of Digital Rights Lawyers Initiative & Ors v National Identity Management Commission (ITDRLI& ORS v NIMC or the Case), in which the CA resolved the conflict on the status of data protection rights in Nigeria. Prior to the decision in the Case, there were conflicting decisions of high courts on whether data protection rights qualified as fundamental right to privacy in section 37 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) (CFRN). The decision of the CA in the Case is that the fundamental right to privacy under section 37 of the CFRN includes data protection rights. This decision of the CA is a milestone in data protection in Nigeria, even though it is relatively late as conversations at the global stage have progressed beyond recognition of data protection rights as part of right to privacy, to advocating for the creation of data protection right, independent of the right to privacy. In this review, we present the facts, arguments, and decision in the Case, summarise previous conflicting decisions on the point, and make our comments on the decision of the CA in the Case, and the global trends of human right-based approach to data protection. We end the review with a conclusion.","PeriodicalId":326636,"journal":{"name":"The Nigerian Juridical Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nigerian Juridical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56284/tnjr.v16i1.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 24 September 2021 the Court of Appeal (CA) delivered judgment in Incorporated Trustees of Digital Rights Lawyers Initiative & Ors v National Identity Management Commission (ITDRLI& ORS v NIMC or the Case), in which the CA resolved the conflict on the status of data protection rights in Nigeria. Prior to the decision in the Case, there were conflicting decisions of high courts on whether data protection rights qualified as fundamental right to privacy in section 37 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) (CFRN). The decision of the CA in the Case is that the fundamental right to privacy under section 37 of the CFRN includes data protection rights. This decision of the CA is a milestone in data protection in Nigeria, even though it is relatively late as conversations at the global stage have progressed beyond recognition of data protection rights as part of right to privacy, to advocating for the creation of data protection right, independent of the right to privacy. In this review, we present the facts, arguments, and decision in the Case, summarise previous conflicting decisions on the point, and make our comments on the decision of the CA in the Case, and the global trends of human right-based approach to data protection. We end the review with a conclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字权利律师倡议和Ors诉国家身份管理委员会的合并受托人:尼日利亚迈向基于人权的数据保护方法的里程碑
2021年9月24日,上诉法院(CA)在数字权利律师倡议和Ors诉国家身份管理委员会(itdrli&ors诉NIMC案)一案中作出判决,其中CA解决了关于尼日利亚数据保护权利现状的冲突。在本案作出裁决之前,高等法院就数据保护权利是否符合1999年尼日利亚联邦共和国宪法(经修正)第37节(尼日利亚联邦共和国宪法)规定的基本隐私权作出了相互矛盾的裁决。上诉法院在该案中的裁决是,《联邦法律条例》第37条规定的基本隐私权包括数据保护权利。CA的这一决定是尼日利亚数据保护的一个里程碑,尽管它相对较晚,因为全球舞台上的对话已经从承认数据保护权是隐私权的一部分,发展到倡导建立独立于隐私权的数据保护权。在这篇综述中,我们介绍了案件中的事实、论点和判决,总结了之前在这一点上相互矛盾的判决,并对案件中法院的判决以及基于人权的数据保护方法的全球趋势发表了我们的评论。我们以结论结束回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Climate Change Regime in Maintaining Internal Security in Nigeria Dysfunctional Nigerian Insurance Industry: Failure of Law or Regulation? Protection of Traditional Knowledge and its Relevance to National Economic Growth and Development in Nigeria Primary Health Care Approach to Achieving Universal Health Coverage in Nigeria: Are Extant Legal and Policy Regimes Adequate? Impact of the Public Procurement Act 2007 on the Functions of Governing Councils of Federal Universities in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1