Product Recalls and Supply Base Innovation

Fan Zou, Yan Dong, Sin-Geun Song, M. Rungtusanatham
{"title":"Product Recalls and Supply Base Innovation","authors":"Fan Zou, Yan Dong, Sin-Geun Song, M. Rungtusanatham","doi":"10.1287/msom.2023.1213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: Suppliers are increasingly involved in innovation activities that contribute to a firm’s product quality and introduce risks to firms’ quality control, leading to quality failures and recalls. This quality trade-off suggests the possibility of a nonlinear relationship between supplier innovation and product recalls, which is the focus of this research. Recall literature focuses on firms’ internal drivers of recalls, whereas anecdotal evidence increasingly points to the role of external drivers, such as suppliers. We contribute to the literature by examining supplier innovation as an external driver leading to recalls via quality and risk spillovers. Methodology/results: We collect and assemble a unique panel data set of consumer product recalls from firms and their supply bases (i.e., first tier suppliers). We estimate econometric models to examine the nonlinear relationship between supply base innovation, measured by research and development (R&D) intensity of the supply bases, and the likelihood of product recalls. We find a quadratic (i.e., U-shaped) relationship between the probability of recalls and supply base R&D intensity. We also find that this nonlinear relationship is critically related to three specific sources of risk: radicalness of supplier innovation, technological distance between firms and their suppliers, and complexity of supply base. Managerial implications: Our findings suggest that firms should be mindful of the quality trade-offs in encouraging supplier innovation to reduce product recalls. Further, to minimize recall risks, firms should better evaluate and manage the risks associated with external supplier knowledge that is novel and different and closely work with global suppliers to reduce coordination challenges in knowledge transfer and integration. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1213 .","PeriodicalId":119284,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Problem definition: Suppliers are increasingly involved in innovation activities that contribute to a firm’s product quality and introduce risks to firms’ quality control, leading to quality failures and recalls. This quality trade-off suggests the possibility of a nonlinear relationship between supplier innovation and product recalls, which is the focus of this research. Recall literature focuses on firms’ internal drivers of recalls, whereas anecdotal evidence increasingly points to the role of external drivers, such as suppliers. We contribute to the literature by examining supplier innovation as an external driver leading to recalls via quality and risk spillovers. Methodology/results: We collect and assemble a unique panel data set of consumer product recalls from firms and their supply bases (i.e., first tier suppliers). We estimate econometric models to examine the nonlinear relationship between supply base innovation, measured by research and development (R&D) intensity of the supply bases, and the likelihood of product recalls. We find a quadratic (i.e., U-shaped) relationship between the probability of recalls and supply base R&D intensity. We also find that this nonlinear relationship is critically related to three specific sources of risk: radicalness of supplier innovation, technological distance between firms and their suppliers, and complexity of supply base. Managerial implications: Our findings suggest that firms should be mindful of the quality trade-offs in encouraging supplier innovation to reduce product recalls. Further, to minimize recall risks, firms should better evaluate and manage the risks associated with external supplier knowledge that is novel and different and closely work with global suppliers to reduce coordination challenges in knowledge transfer and integration. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1213 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产品召回和供应基础创新
问题定义:供应商越来越多地参与创新活动,这些活动有助于提高公司的产品质量,并给公司的质量控制带来风险,导致质量失败和召回。这种质量权衡表明供应商创新与产品召回之间可能存在非线性关系,这是本研究的重点。召回文献关注公司召回的内部驱动因素,而轶事证据越来越多地指向外部驱动因素的作用,如供应商。我们通过检查供应商创新作为通过质量和风险溢出导致召回的外部驱动因素,为文献做出贡献。方法/结果:我们收集和组装一个独特的面板数据集,从公司和他们的供应基地(即,第一级供应商)的消费品召回。我们使用计量经济模型来检验供应基地创新(以供应基地的研发强度衡量)与产品召回可能性之间的非线性关系。我们发现召回概率与供应基地研发强度之间呈二次型(即u型)关系。我们还发现,这种非线性关系与三个特定的风险来源密切相关:供应商创新的激进性、企业与其供应商之间的技术距离和供应基础的复杂性。管理启示:我们的研究结果表明,在鼓励供应商创新以减少产品召回方面,企业应该注意质量权衡。此外,为了最大限度地降低召回风险,企业应更好地评估和管理与外部供应商新颖和不同的知识相关的风险,并与全球供应商密切合作,以减少知识转移和整合方面的协调挑战。补充材料:在线附录可在https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1213上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physician Adoption of AI Assistant Disclosing Delivery Performance Information When Consumers Are Sensitive to Promised Delivery Time, Delivery Reliability, and Price Loyalty Currency and Mental Accounting: Do Consumers Treat Points Like Money? Dealership or Marketplace with Fulfillment Services: A Dynamic Comparison Introduction: Frontiers in Operations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1