Critical comparison of energy management algorithms for lithium-ion batteries in renewable power plants

A. Berrueta, A. M. Miguel García, Í. de la Parra, P. Sanchis, A. Ursúa
{"title":"Critical comparison of energy management algorithms for lithium-ion batteries in renewable power plants","authors":"A. Berrueta, A. M. Miguel García, Í. de la Parra, P. Sanchis, A. Ursúa","doi":"10.1109/EEEIC.2019.8783864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lithium-ion batteries are gaining importance for a variety of applications due to their price decrease and characteristics improvement. A good energy management strategy is required in order to increase the profitability of an energy system using a Li-ion battery for storage. The vast number of management algorithms that has been proposed to optimize the achieved profit, with diverse computational power requirements and using models with different complexity, raise doubts about the suitability of an algorithm and the required computation power for a particular application. The performance of three energy management algorithms based on linear, quadratic, and dynamic programming are compared in this work. A realistic scenario of a medium-sized PV plant with a constraint of peak shaving is used for this comparison. The results achieved by the three algorithms are compared and the grounds of the differences are analyzed. Among the three compared algorithms, the quadratic one seems to be the most suitable for renewableenergy applications, given the undue simplification of the battery aging required by the linear algorithm and the discretization and computational power required by a dynamic algorithm.","PeriodicalId":422977,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2019 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2019 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC.2019.8783864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries are gaining importance for a variety of applications due to their price decrease and characteristics improvement. A good energy management strategy is required in order to increase the profitability of an energy system using a Li-ion battery for storage. The vast number of management algorithms that has been proposed to optimize the achieved profit, with diverse computational power requirements and using models with different complexity, raise doubts about the suitability of an algorithm and the required computation power for a particular application. The performance of three energy management algorithms based on linear, quadratic, and dynamic programming are compared in this work. A realistic scenario of a medium-sized PV plant with a constraint of peak shaving is used for this comparison. The results achieved by the three algorithms are compared and the grounds of the differences are analyzed. Among the three compared algorithms, the quadratic one seems to be the most suitable for renewableenergy applications, given the undue simplification of the battery aging required by the linear algorithm and the discretization and computational power required by a dynamic algorithm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可再生能源发电厂锂离子电池能量管理算法的关键比较
锂离子电池由于其价格的下降和性能的改善,在各种应用中越来越重要。为了提高使用锂离子电池储能的能源系统的盈利能力,需要一个良好的能源管理策略。为了优化已实现的利润而提出的大量管理算法,其计算能力要求各异,使用的模型复杂性也不同,这使得人们对算法的适用性和特定应用所需的计算能力产生了怀疑。本文比较了基于线性规划、二次规划和动态规划的三种能量管理算法的性能。本文以一个具有调峰约束的中型光伏电站为例进行了比较。比较了三种算法的结果,并分析了产生差异的原因。在三种比较算法中,考虑到线性算法对电池老化的过度简化和动态算法所需的离散化和计算能力,二次型算法似乎最适合于可再生能源应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Agile Development Process and User-centric Data Driven Design for an Integrated Energy System Machine Learning for Agile and Self-Adaptive Congestion Management in Active Distribution Networks Full Bridge LLC Resonant Three-Phase Interleaved Multi Converter For HV Applications Standalone PV-BES-DG Based Microgrid with Power Quality Improvements Performance of Neural Network Based Controllers and ΔΣ-Based PID Controllers for Networked Control Systems: A Comparative Investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1