A Methodology for Quantifying Distortion Impacts Using a Modified Parallel Compressor Theory

M. Pokhrel, Jonathan C. Gladin, Elena Garcia, D. Mavris
{"title":"A Methodology for Quantifying Distortion Impacts Using a Modified Parallel Compressor Theory","authors":"M. Pokhrel, Jonathan C. Gladin, Elena Garcia, D. Mavris","doi":"10.1115/GT2018-77089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efforts to achieve NASA’s N+2 and N+3 fuel burn goals have led to various future aircraft concepts. A commonality in all these concepts is the presence of a high degree of interaction among the various disciplines involved. A tightly integrated propulsion/airframe results in distortion in the flow field around the engine annulus. Although beneficial in terms of propulsive efficiency (due to boundary layer ingestion), the impact of distortion on fan performance and operability remains in question for these concepts. As such, rapid evaluation of the impacts of distortion during the conceptual design phase is necessary to assess various concepts. This is especially important given the expansion of the design space afforded by turbo-electric and hybrid-electric distributed propulsion concepts, in which the gas turbine generator and propulsive devices can be decoupled in space.\n A simple and rapid methodology to assess operability of compressors is the theory of Parallel Compressors (PC). PC theory views the compressor as two compressors in parallel, one with a uniform high Pt and the other with a uniform low Pt, both operating at the same speed and exiting to a common static pressure. The assumption of two compressors exiting at the common static pressure is not entirely true, especially when the distortion is high. In this paper, the development of a modified parallel compressor model with parametric boundary condition that can capture the impact of non-uniform inflow on fan performance is introduced and validated. Unlike classical PC model, the modified approach introduces a boundary condition dependent on the intensity of distortion (DPCP) at the Aerodynamic Interface Plane (AIP). Additionally, the concept of PC is also extended to Multi-Per Revolution (MPR) distortion.\n A modeling environment which follows this methodology is created in PROOSIS, an object oriented 0-D cycle code. The model was created using the “compressor” components acting in parallel and a procedure for implementing both design mode and off-design mode solutions was created using the PROOSIS toolset. The example problem was implemented to demonstrate two capabilities — i) the ability of quantifying impacts on thrust and performance of a ducted fan propulsion system, and ii) the ability of predicting loss in stability pressure ratio. The results clearly show the ability of the tool to quantify distortion related losses.\n The work described in this paper can be integrated to a Multi-Disciplinary Design and Optimization (MDAO) framework along with other disciplines and can be used to evaluate the viability of design space offered by novel aircraft configurations.","PeriodicalId":114672,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Aircraft Engine; Fans and Blowers; Marine","volume":"401 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Aircraft Engine; Fans and Blowers; Marine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-77089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Efforts to achieve NASA’s N+2 and N+3 fuel burn goals have led to various future aircraft concepts. A commonality in all these concepts is the presence of a high degree of interaction among the various disciplines involved. A tightly integrated propulsion/airframe results in distortion in the flow field around the engine annulus. Although beneficial in terms of propulsive efficiency (due to boundary layer ingestion), the impact of distortion on fan performance and operability remains in question for these concepts. As such, rapid evaluation of the impacts of distortion during the conceptual design phase is necessary to assess various concepts. This is especially important given the expansion of the design space afforded by turbo-electric and hybrid-electric distributed propulsion concepts, in which the gas turbine generator and propulsive devices can be decoupled in space. A simple and rapid methodology to assess operability of compressors is the theory of Parallel Compressors (PC). PC theory views the compressor as two compressors in parallel, one with a uniform high Pt and the other with a uniform low Pt, both operating at the same speed and exiting to a common static pressure. The assumption of two compressors exiting at the common static pressure is not entirely true, especially when the distortion is high. In this paper, the development of a modified parallel compressor model with parametric boundary condition that can capture the impact of non-uniform inflow on fan performance is introduced and validated. Unlike classical PC model, the modified approach introduces a boundary condition dependent on the intensity of distortion (DPCP) at the Aerodynamic Interface Plane (AIP). Additionally, the concept of PC is also extended to Multi-Per Revolution (MPR) distortion. A modeling environment which follows this methodology is created in PROOSIS, an object oriented 0-D cycle code. The model was created using the “compressor” components acting in parallel and a procedure for implementing both design mode and off-design mode solutions was created using the PROOSIS toolset. The example problem was implemented to demonstrate two capabilities — i) the ability of quantifying impacts on thrust and performance of a ducted fan propulsion system, and ii) the ability of predicting loss in stability pressure ratio. The results clearly show the ability of the tool to quantify distortion related losses. The work described in this paper can be integrated to a Multi-Disciplinary Design and Optimization (MDAO) framework along with other disciplines and can be used to evaluate the viability of design space offered by novel aircraft configurations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种利用改进的平行压缩器理论量化失真影响的方法
为实现NASA的N+2和N+3燃料消耗目标所做的努力导致了各种未来飞机的概念。所有这些概念的共同之处在于,所涉及的各个学科之间存在着高度的相互作用。一个紧密结合的推进/机身导致了发动机环空周围流场的畸变。虽然在推进效率方面是有益的(由于边界层的摄入),但变形对风扇性能和可操作性的影响仍然是这些概念的问题。因此,在概念设计阶段快速评估变形的影响对于评估各种概念是必要的。考虑到涡轮电力和混合电力分布式推进概念所提供的设计空间的扩展,这一点尤其重要,其中燃气涡轮发电机和推进装置可以在空间上解耦。并行压缩机(PC)理论是评估压缩机可操作性的一种简单快速的方法。PC理论将压缩机视为两台并联的压缩机,一台具有均匀的高Pt,另一台具有均匀的低Pt,两者以相同的速度运行并以共同的静压出口。两个压气机在共同静压下存在的假设并不完全正确,特别是当畸变较大时。本文介绍并验证了一种带有参数边界条件的改进并联压缩机模型,该模型可以捕捉非均匀流入对风扇性能的影响。与传统的PC模型不同,改进后的方法在气动界面平面(AIP)上引入了依赖于畸变强度(DPCP)的边界条件。此外,PC的概念也扩展到多每转(MPR)失真。遵循这种方法的建模环境是在PROOSIS中创建的,PROOSIS是一种面向对象的0-D循环代码。该模型使用并行运行的“压缩器”组件创建,并使用PROOSIS工具集创建了实现设计模式和非设计模式解决方案的过程。示例问题的实施是为了展示两种能力- i)量化对导管风扇推进系统推力和性能的影响的能力,ii)预测稳定压力比损失的能力。结果清楚地显示了该工具量化失真相关损失的能力。本文中描述的工作可以与其他学科一起集成到多学科设计与优化(MDAO)框架中,并可用于评估新飞机配置提供的设计空间的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Numerical Investigation on Bearing Chamber Wall Heat Transfer Effect of Aft Rotor on Forward Rotor Blade Wakes in Open Rotor Propulsion Systems Thermodynamic Analysis on Optimum Pressure Ratio Split of Intercooled Recuperated Turbofan Engines On the Efficacy of Integrating Structural Struts With Lobed Mixers in Turbofan Engine Exhaust Systems Thermodynamic Performance Enhancement of Marine Gas Turbine by Using Detonation Combustion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1