New frontiers in surgery

G. Selvaggi, Sean Aas
{"title":"New frontiers in surgery","authors":"G. Selvaggi, Sean Aas","doi":"10.7765/9781526127686.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various types of organ transplantations are now considered standard procedures: heart and liver transplants lengthen lives; kidney transplants also do so, as well as improving quality of life by reducing or eliminating the need for dialysis. The transplantation of faces and limbs, a more novel set of techniques, improves quality of life without necessarily lengthening or ‘saving’ lives. An even more recent development is uterus and penis transplantations, which also do not save or lengthen life, but increase reproductive and sexual function and thereby improve quality of life. This chapter identifies and discusses central ethical issues that are likely to arise in the development of uterus and penis transplantations. These include general issues related to the ethics of surgical research, and specific concerns regarding the rationale of these particular procedures in the context of reproductive and sexual medicine. How should prospective patient-subjects be selected for innovative surgeries? Are these procedures appropriate as treatment for gender dysphoria, or should they be restricted to people whose reproductive and sexual organs have been damaged by illness or accident? Who is most likely to benefit and how are benefit and risks to be judged? What are the alternatives to these transplant surgeries? How should donor organs be sourced? Finally, more broadly, how should we think of these procedures from the perspective of cost-effectiveness – are these expensive, non-life-saving procedures a good use of scarce health resources in light of pressing global needs?","PeriodicalId":368881,"journal":{"name":"The freedom of scientific research","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The freedom of scientific research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526127686.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Various types of organ transplantations are now considered standard procedures: heart and liver transplants lengthen lives; kidney transplants also do so, as well as improving quality of life by reducing or eliminating the need for dialysis. The transplantation of faces and limbs, a more novel set of techniques, improves quality of life without necessarily lengthening or ‘saving’ lives. An even more recent development is uterus and penis transplantations, which also do not save or lengthen life, but increase reproductive and sexual function and thereby improve quality of life. This chapter identifies and discusses central ethical issues that are likely to arise in the development of uterus and penis transplantations. These include general issues related to the ethics of surgical research, and specific concerns regarding the rationale of these particular procedures in the context of reproductive and sexual medicine. How should prospective patient-subjects be selected for innovative surgeries? Are these procedures appropriate as treatment for gender dysphoria, or should they be restricted to people whose reproductive and sexual organs have been damaged by illness or accident? Who is most likely to benefit and how are benefit and risks to be judged? What are the alternatives to these transplant surgeries? How should donor organs be sourced? Finally, more broadly, how should we think of these procedures from the perspective of cost-effectiveness – are these expensive, non-life-saving procedures a good use of scarce health resources in light of pressing global needs?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科新领域
各种类型的器官移植现在被认为是标准程序:心脏和肝脏移植可以延长生命;肾脏移植也能做到这一点,而且通过减少或消除透析的需要来提高生活质量。面部和肢体的移植是一套更新颖的技术,可以提高生活质量,但不一定能延长或“挽救”生命。最近的一项发展是子宫和阴茎移植,它也不能挽救或延长生命,但可以增加生殖和性功能,从而提高生活质量。本章确定并讨论了在子宫和阴茎移植的发展过程中可能出现的核心伦理问题。这些问题包括与外科研究伦理有关的一般问题,以及关于生殖和性医学背景下这些特定程序的基本原理的具体问题。如何选择前瞻性的患者受试者进行创新手术?这些方法是否适合用于治疗性别焦虑,还是应该仅限于生殖器官和性器官因疾病或事故而受损的人?谁最有可能受益,如何判断收益和风险?这些移植手术的替代方案是什么?如何获得捐赠器官?最后,更广泛地说,我们应该如何从成本效益的角度看待这些程序——鉴于紧迫的全球需求,这些昂贵的非挽救生命的程序是对稀缺卫生资源的良好利用吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contributors List of figures Index Introduction to Part II Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1