The Establishment Conditions of the Separation of Accomplice

Liu Yiting
{"title":"The Establishment Conditions of the Separation of Accomplice","authors":"Liu Yiting","doi":"10.23977/law.2023.020201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In the process of joint crime, some accomplices voluntarily give up their behavior and strive to prevent the occurrence of crime, but still fail to prevent the occurrence of results. The issue of accountability has always been a difficult issue in criminal theory and practice. In China's criminal law, there is no concept of separation of accomplice relationships. For the difficulties caused by such accomplice cases in judicial practice, in practice, it is usually regarded as a completed crime, and separation is only a case of discretionary sentencing. The acceptance of accomplices' disengagement from relationships is low. This approach clearly violates the principle of adapting crime, responsibility, and punishment in China, and there are also drawbacks to varying degrees. Therefore, this article introduces the theory of separation of accomplice relations. Based on the investigation of the separation of accomplices at home and abroad, it is believed that different accomplices have different requirements for separation from accomplices due to their different division of labor and stages in accomplices.","PeriodicalId":271650,"journal":{"name":"Science of Law Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: In the process of joint crime, some accomplices voluntarily give up their behavior and strive to prevent the occurrence of crime, but still fail to prevent the occurrence of results. The issue of accountability has always been a difficult issue in criminal theory and practice. In China's criminal law, there is no concept of separation of accomplice relationships. For the difficulties caused by such accomplice cases in judicial practice, in practice, it is usually regarded as a completed crime, and separation is only a case of discretionary sentencing. The acceptance of accomplices' disengagement from relationships is low. This approach clearly violates the principle of adapting crime, responsibility, and punishment in China, and there are also drawbacks to varying degrees. Therefore, this article introduces the theory of separation of accomplice relations. Based on the investigation of the separation of accomplices at home and abroad, it is believed that different accomplices have different requirements for separation from accomplices due to their different division of labor and stages in accomplices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共犯分离的成立条件
在共同犯罪过程中,部分共犯自愿放弃自己的行为,努力防止犯罪的发生,但仍未能防止结果的发生。问责问题一直是刑事理论和实践中的一个难题。在中国刑法中,并没有共犯关系分离的概念。由于这类共犯案件在司法实践中所造成的困难,在实践中通常将其视为犯罪既遂,分离只是一种酌定量刑的情况。共犯脱离关系的接受度很低。这种做法明显违背了中国罪责刑相适应的原则,也存在不同程度的弊端。因此,本文引入共犯关系分离理论。通过对国内外共犯分离的考察,认为不同的共犯由于其在共犯中的分工和阶段不同,对共犯分离的要求也不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on Optimization Path of the Legal Aid System for College Students Determination of Qualified Subjects of Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of International Law Liability Rules for Algorithmic Discrimination Examination of the Constituent Elements of Liability for Ecological Environmental Damage Research and Establishment of the Marital Tort Liability System in Marriage Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1