The Plea Bargaining System as a Criminalization Model Under the Law Number 19 Year of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transaction Act and the Dignified Justice

Rinto Wardana
{"title":"The Plea Bargaining System as a Criminalization Model Under the Law Number 19 Year of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transaction Act and the Dignified Justice","authors":"Rinto Wardana","doi":"10.19166/glr.v1i2.4098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the perspective of economic analysis of law theory, the increasing number of criminal convictions  would indicate that the Indonesian  criminal Code and regulations have not been  effective in reducing the rate of crimes. By combining a preliminary hearing, hearing of cases through a special route and the application of the principle of bargaining for sentence in the plea bargaining system, a new mechanism may be formulated in the Indonesia criminal justice proceedings. This criminal justice approach employs the dignified justice principle (teori keadilan bermartabat) approach, whereby, the trial of cases using a preliminary hearing as a special route under a sole judge that is intended for an accused who pleads guilty and bargains for a sentence. Accordingly, this research attempts  to explore the use of the principles of the plea bargaining system as a criminal justice model under the Law Number 19 year of 2016 on the Electronic Information and Transaction Act (“EIT Act”). Equally important, this research employs the juridical-normative method, statute, case, and conceptual approaches in order to obtain a comprehensive result. ","PeriodicalId":344294,"journal":{"name":"Global Legal Review","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Legal Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v1i2.4098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the perspective of economic analysis of law theory, the increasing number of criminal convictions  would indicate that the Indonesian  criminal Code and regulations have not been  effective in reducing the rate of crimes. By combining a preliminary hearing, hearing of cases through a special route and the application of the principle of bargaining for sentence in the plea bargaining system, a new mechanism may be formulated in the Indonesia criminal justice proceedings. This criminal justice approach employs the dignified justice principle (teori keadilan bermartabat) approach, whereby, the trial of cases using a preliminary hearing as a special route under a sole judge that is intended for an accused who pleads guilty and bargains for a sentence. Accordingly, this research attempts  to explore the use of the principles of the plea bargaining system as a criminal justice model under the Law Number 19 year of 2016 on the Electronic Information and Transaction Act (“EIT Act”). Equally important, this research employs the juridical-normative method, statute, case, and conceptual approaches in order to obtain a comprehensive result. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2016年第19号法律《电子信息交易法与尊严正义》下的认罪交易制度定罪模式
从法学理论的经济分析的角度来看,刑事定罪数量的增加表明印度尼西亚的刑法和条例在降低犯罪率方面没有起到有效的作用。通过将预审、特殊途径审理案件和辩诉交易制度中议价减刑原则的运用相结合,可以在印尼刑事司法诉讼中形成新的机制。这种刑事司法方法采用有尊严的司法原则(teori keadilan bermartabat)方法,即在一名单独法官的领导下,对案件的审判采用预审作为一种特殊途径,目的是为认罪并为判刑讨价还价的被告。因此,本研究试图在2016年第19号法律《电子信息与交易法》(以下简称“EIT法”)下探讨辩诉交易制度原则作为刑事司法模式的运用。同样重要的是,本研究采用了司法规范方法、法规、案例和概念方法,以获得全面的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Analysis of Corporate Crime in Indonesia’s Intellectual Property Laws Borrowing Company Names in the Practice of Procurement of Goods and Services in Indonesia Legal Protection for Consumers of Life Insurance Products During COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia The Impact of the Trade War Between the United States and China on ASEAN and Huawei Technologies as Reviewed by Trade, Investment, and Competition Law Legal Policy of Implementation of Organizing Umrah Worship in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1