A Review of Women’s Leadership Conferences: Ways Public Research Institutions Support Female Students Opting-In

T. Reis, Marilyn L. Grady
{"title":"A Review of Women’s Leadership Conferences: Ways Public Research Institutions Support Female Students Opting-In","authors":"T. Reis, Marilyn L. Grady","doi":"10.13014/K2J1012P","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of women’s leadership conferences at public research universities. A search of the 2015 Carnegie Classification of Institutes of Higher Education revealed a list of 157 research universities. Of these institutions, 40 held a women’s leadership conference. Implications are discussed in how a women’s leadership conference supports female students opting-in. The story of women and leadership is complicated. According to Eagly and Carli (2007a,b), women are finding their way to leadership positions. A complex labyrinth has replaced absolute barriers, and women exhibit creative and resourceful strategies in navigating a non-linear leadership path (Eagly & Carli, 2007a,b). Although women remain significantly underrepresented in top leadership positions, the labyrinth Eagly and Carli described remains a metaphor of explanation. Journal of Women in Educational Leadership, 2017 2 Issues associated with women’s persistence toward leadership positions begin in the sociological beliefs of a woman’s role and the responsibilities of work and family (Carli & Eagly, 2007; Eagly & Carli, 2007a; Keohane, 2007). Women, regardless of marriage or status, remain closely linked to biased views of work capacity. For example, women are not expected to be the sole source of financial support within a family; and thus, they are perceived to not require the salary that a male peer earns. Women are viewed as the primary caregiver to children; and thus, they may be given less responsibility due to the perception a woman has less time to commit to work-related projects. The bias associated with role congruity (Eagly & Karau, 2010), and how role expectations define the boundaries of a woman’s world, contribute to an overriding shadow on how women’s work is interpreted and rewarded in the leadership domain. The definition of gender and societal roles have changed (Eagly & Carli, 2007a; Rhode & Kellerman, 2007). Men and women share household duties and childcare. The firm boundaries of gender roles are bending. As women’s educational qualifications increase, their presence in leadership positions increases. In 2016, women represented 50.8% of the United States population and earned more than half of all bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral degrees (Catalyst, 2016). Women comprise nearly half the workforce and make-up 36.4% of mid-level management and 25.1% of senior management positions (Catalyst, 2016). The fact that only 4.6% of women lead S&P 500 companies lends credence to an understanding of how women are supported within the labyrinth framework and provides an important context for how women sustain their leadership journeys.","PeriodicalId":346635,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Women in Educational Leadership","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Women in Educational Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13014/K2J1012P","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of women’s leadership conferences at public research universities. A search of the 2015 Carnegie Classification of Institutes of Higher Education revealed a list of 157 research universities. Of these institutions, 40 held a women’s leadership conference. Implications are discussed in how a women’s leadership conference supports female students opting-in. The story of women and leadership is complicated. According to Eagly and Carli (2007a,b), women are finding their way to leadership positions. A complex labyrinth has replaced absolute barriers, and women exhibit creative and resourceful strategies in navigating a non-linear leadership path (Eagly & Carli, 2007a,b). Although women remain significantly underrepresented in top leadership positions, the labyrinth Eagly and Carli described remains a metaphor of explanation. Journal of Women in Educational Leadership, 2017 2 Issues associated with women’s persistence toward leadership positions begin in the sociological beliefs of a woman’s role and the responsibilities of work and family (Carli & Eagly, 2007; Eagly & Carli, 2007a; Keohane, 2007). Women, regardless of marriage or status, remain closely linked to biased views of work capacity. For example, women are not expected to be the sole source of financial support within a family; and thus, they are perceived to not require the salary that a male peer earns. Women are viewed as the primary caregiver to children; and thus, they may be given less responsibility due to the perception a woman has less time to commit to work-related projects. The bias associated with role congruity (Eagly & Karau, 2010), and how role expectations define the boundaries of a woman’s world, contribute to an overriding shadow on how women’s work is interpreted and rewarded in the leadership domain. The definition of gender and societal roles have changed (Eagly & Carli, 2007a; Rhode & Kellerman, 2007). Men and women share household duties and childcare. The firm boundaries of gender roles are bending. As women’s educational qualifications increase, their presence in leadership positions increases. In 2016, women represented 50.8% of the United States population and earned more than half of all bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral degrees (Catalyst, 2016). Women comprise nearly half the workforce and make-up 36.4% of mid-level management and 25.1% of senior management positions (Catalyst, 2016). The fact that only 4.6% of women lead S&P 500 companies lends credence to an understanding of how women are supported within the labyrinth framework and provides an important context for how women sustain their leadership journeys.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾妇女领导会议:公共研究机构支持女学生选择参加的方式
本报告的目的是概述公立研究型大学的妇女领导会议。2015年卡内基高等教育机构分类显示了157所研究型大学的名单。在这些机构中,有40个机构举行了妇女领导会议。讨论了妇女领导会议如何支持女学生选择参加的影响。女性和领导力的故事很复杂。根据Eagly和Carli (2007a,b)的说法,女性正在寻找通往领导职位的道路。一个复杂的迷宫已经取代了绝对的障碍,女性在导航非线性领导路径上表现出创造性和足智多谋的策略(Eagly & Carli, 2007年A,b)。尽管女性在高层领导职位上的比例仍然明显偏低,但伊格利和卡莉所描述的迷宫仍然是一种解释的隐喻。与女性对领导职位的坚持相关的问题始于对女性角色和工作和家庭责任的社会学信念(Carli & Eagly, 2007;Eagly & Carli, 2007;>》,2007)。妇女,无论婚姻或地位如何,仍然与对工作能力的偏见密切相关。例如,不期望妇女成为家庭经济支持的唯一来源;因此,她们被认为不需要男性同事挣的薪水。妇女被视为儿童的主要照顾者;因此,他们可能会被赋予较少的责任,因为他们认为女性没有多少时间致力于与工作相关的项目。与角色一致性相关的偏见(Eagly & Karau, 2010),以及角色期望如何定义女性世界的界限,对女性的工作如何在领导领域得到解释和奖励产生了压倒一切的阴影。性别和社会角色的定义已经改变(Eagly & Carli, 2007a;罗德&凯勒曼出版社,2007)。男人和女人分担家务和照顾孩子。性别角色的严格界限正在改变。随着女性受教育程度的提高,她们在领导岗位上的出现也在增加。2016年,女性占美国人口的50.8%,获得了一半以上的学士、硕士和博士学位(Catalyst, 2016)。女性占劳动力的近一半,占中级管理职位的36.4%,占高级管理职位的25.1% (Catalyst, 2016)。只有4.6%的女性领导标准普尔500指数公司,这一事实为理解女性在迷宫般的框架中如何得到支持提供了依据,并为女性如何维持其领导之旅提供了重要背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surrendering to Gender in Education? Complacency and the Woman Leader Impediments to the Advancement of Women at Community Colleges Latina School Leadership: Breaking the Mold and Rising to the Top Arts Education Funding Self-Efficacy of Female School Board Presidents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1