Pojmowanie ciała w ramach koncepcji śmierci mózgowej a chrześcijańskie rozumienie człowieka i jego cielesności. Zarys problematyki

Logos i Ethos Pub Date : 2020-04-30 DOI:10.15633/lie.3582
A. Maliszewska
{"title":"Pojmowanie ciała w ramach koncepcji śmierci mózgowej a chrześcijańskie rozumienie człowieka i jego cielesności. Zarys problematyki","authors":"A. Maliszewska","doi":"10.15633/lie.3582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The brain death definition, although starting from empirical data, is a purely philosophical concept based on concrete anthropological assumptions. These scientific data are only starting point which demands interpretation. The purpose of this study is to discover anthropological assumptions laying under the brain death definition – or rather, to be more precise, under two main types of brain death definition – and to confront the findings with view on the human being from Christian perspective, especially regarding the human bodility. Although it seems that most theologians and hierarchs of the Catholic Church are favorable towards the brain death definition, this idea is quite controversial from the catholic standpoint. This paper also engages in polemics with catholic theologians who try to reconcile the modern medical criterium of human death with theological “definition” of death, missing precious threads of Christian tradition ­regarding the human being.","PeriodicalId":353688,"journal":{"name":"Logos i Ethos","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logos i Ethos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.3582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The brain death definition, although starting from empirical data, is a purely philosophical concept based on concrete anthropological assumptions. These scientific data are only starting point which demands interpretation. The purpose of this study is to discover anthropological assumptions laying under the brain death definition – or rather, to be more precise, under two main types of brain death definition – and to confront the findings with view on the human being from Christian perspective, especially regarding the human bodility. Although it seems that most theologians and hierarchs of the Catholic Church are favorable towards the brain death definition, this idea is quite controversial from the catholic standpoint. This paper also engages in polemics with catholic theologians who try to reconcile the modern medical criterium of human death with theological “definition” of death, missing precious threads of Christian tradition ­regarding the human being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑死亡的定义虽然是从经验数据出发,但却是一个基于具体人类学假设的纯哲学概念。这些科学数据只是需要解释的起点。本研究的目的是发现在脑死亡定义下的人类学假设——或者更确切地说,在两种主要的脑死亡定义下——并从基督教的角度看待人类,特别是关于人类身体的观点来面对这些发现。虽然天主教会的大多数神学家和等级似乎都赞成脑死亡的定义,但从天主教的角度来看,这一想法是相当有争议的。本文还与天主教神学家进行了辩论,他们试图将人类死亡的现代医学标准与神学对死亡的“定义”相调和,而忽略了基督教传统中关于人类的宝贵线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Próba ujęcia tego, co nieujmowalne. Recenzja: Krzysztof Paczos, „Noetyka”, Béziers 2021 Utopia anielska jako wzorzec społeczności ziemskiej w myśli Pseudo-Dionizego i Tomasza z Akwinu Między wiarą a rozumem. Doświadczenie prawzorcze u Hansa Ursa von Balthasara a Absolutnie Niepojęte u Siemiona Ludwigowicza Franka Dramaturgia artykułu 17. kodeksu etyki lekarskiej. Ujęcie sytuacji niepomyślnych rokowań z wykorzystaniem aksjologii Józefa Tischnera Kryzys nadziei i zadanie filozofii w myśli Józefa Tischnera
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1