Preventive Health at Work: A Comparative Approach

Julie C. Suk
{"title":"Preventive Health at Work: A Comparative Approach","authors":"Julie C. Suk","doi":"10.5131/AJCL.2010.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, the prevention of costly chronic diseases is an important ambition of healthcare reform. In many European countries, preventive health services are widely distributed in the workplace, through the complex infrastructure of occupational safety and health law. European and national laws impose on employers the duty to prevent risks to workers’ health. In France, as in many European countries, workplace doctors specializing in preventive medicine enable the employer to fulfill the prevention duty. The law requires employers to provide regular preventive checkups to all employees. Occupational physicians monitor employees’ health and engage in workplace policymaking to minimize environmental factors that can exacerbate employees’ chronic diseases. In the United States, employers are increasingly taking an interest in providing onsite preventive health services in order to cut healthcare costs. To identify and understand some of the challenges for integrating preventive health into the American workplace, this Article explores why and how American company clinics function so differently from French workplace health services. The workplace clinics in the two countries are governed by two fundamentally different employment law regimes, which have significant consequences for their ability to optimize employees’ health and pursue public health goals.","PeriodicalId":410798,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Legal Studies eJournal","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Legal Studies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2010.0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the United States, the prevention of costly chronic diseases is an important ambition of healthcare reform. In many European countries, preventive health services are widely distributed in the workplace, through the complex infrastructure of occupational safety and health law. European and national laws impose on employers the duty to prevent risks to workers’ health. In France, as in many European countries, workplace doctors specializing in preventive medicine enable the employer to fulfill the prevention duty. The law requires employers to provide regular preventive checkups to all employees. Occupational physicians monitor employees’ health and engage in workplace policymaking to minimize environmental factors that can exacerbate employees’ chronic diseases. In the United States, employers are increasingly taking an interest in providing onsite preventive health services in order to cut healthcare costs. To identify and understand some of the challenges for integrating preventive health into the American workplace, this Article explores why and how American company clinics function so differently from French workplace health services. The workplace clinics in the two countries are governed by two fundamentally different employment law regimes, which have significant consequences for their ability to optimize employees’ health and pursue public health goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作中的预防保健:比较方法
在美国,预防昂贵的慢性病是医疗改革的一个重要目标。在许多欧洲国家,通过职业安全和健康法的复杂基础设施,预防性保健服务在工作场所广泛分布。欧洲和各国法律规定雇主有义务防止对工人健康造成危害。在法国和许多欧洲国家一样,专门从事预防医学的工作场所医生使雇主能够履行预防义务。法律要求雇主为所有雇员提供定期的预防性检查。职业医生监测员工的健康状况,并参与工作场所的决策,以尽量减少可能加剧员工慢性病的环境因素。在美国,雇主越来越有兴趣提供现场预防保健服务,以减少医疗保健费用。为了识别和理解将预防性健康纳入美国工作场所的一些挑战,本文探讨了美国公司诊所与法国工作场所健康服务如此不同的原因和方式。这两个国家的工作场所诊所受两种根本不同的就业法制度管辖,这对它们优化雇员健康和追求公共卫生目标的能力产生了重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Who Gets Medication-assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder, and Does It Reduce Overdose Risk? Evidence from the Rhode Island All-payer Claims Database The Architecture Behind the Malpractice Concept Guidelines Tax Evasion and Illicit Cigarettes in California: Part I – Survey Evidence on Current Behavior Regulatory Exclusivity Revision: Working to Achieve Greater Innovation in Approved New Molecular Entities Leviathan in the Commons: Biomedical Data and the State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1