Il formalismo testamentario e le tecnologie assistive per le persone con disabilità: profili giuridici e organizzativi. | Testamentary formalism and assistive technologies for people with disabilities: legal and organizational profiles.

Anna Anita Mollo, Domenico Napolitano, L. M. Sicca
{"title":"Il formalismo testamentario e le tecnologie assistive per le persone con disabilità: profili giuridici e organizzativi. | Testamentary formalism and assistive technologies for people with disabilities: legal and organizational profiles.","authors":"Anna Anita Mollo, Domenico Napolitano, L. M. Sicca","doi":"10.57230/ejplt222aam","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assistive technologies, as most recently enhanced by artificial intelligence, are increasingly used by persons with disabilities to express their will. However, the current legal framework does not always allow the use of technological tools for the conclusion of valid legal transactions. More specifically, in this contribution, attention will be focused on the analysis of the rules governing succession law in order to show how the rigid testamentary formalism that characterizes our legal system is an obstacle to the finalization of a valid will by those who can only express themselves by means of technological devices. The social repercussions, from the perspective of organizational studies, of the contradictions arising from the lack of coordination between technological development, the legal framework and the specific needs of people with disabilities will also be examined.","PeriodicalId":446260,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Privacy Law & Technologies","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Privacy Law & Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57230/ejplt222aam","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assistive technologies, as most recently enhanced by artificial intelligence, are increasingly used by persons with disabilities to express their will. However, the current legal framework does not always allow the use of technological tools for the conclusion of valid legal transactions. More specifically, in this contribution, attention will be focused on the analysis of the rules governing succession law in order to show how the rigid testamentary formalism that characterizes our legal system is an obstacle to the finalization of a valid will by those who can only express themselves by means of technological devices. The social repercussions, from the perspective of organizational studies, of the contradictions arising from the lack of coordination between technological development, the legal framework and the specific needs of people with disabilities will also be examined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗嘱形式主义和技术帮助残疾人:法律和组织概况。辅助| Testamentary formalism and technologies for people with》:legal and organizational profiles。
随着人工智能的发展,辅助技术越来越多地被残疾人用来表达他们的意愿。然而,目前的法律框架并不总是允许使用技术工具来达成有效的法律交易。更具体地说,在这篇文章中,将把注意力集中在对继承法规则的分析上,以表明作为我们法律制度特征的严格的遗嘱形式主义是如何阻碍那些只能通过技术手段表达自己的人最终确定一份有效遗嘱的。从组织研究的角度,还将审查由于技术发展、法律框架和残疾人的具体需要之间缺乏协调而产生的矛盾的社会影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Child Participation and Experiential Learning in Food: A New Approach to Childhood Obesity Beyond Bitcoin: Understanding Legal Boundaries of Blockchain Technology Applicazione I.A. della pena pecuniaria nel sistema penale peruviano: una proposta di ricerca per dare un futuro al “presente novecentesco” del sistema carcerario italiano. L’impatto della pubblicità e del marketing on line sul comportamento alimentare Artificial Intelligence and Self-determination in Medical Field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1