The validity of word age-of-acquisition ratings : a longitudinal study of a child's word knowledge

Anthony F Jorm
{"title":"The validity of word age-of-acquisition ratings : a longitudinal study of a child's word knowledge","authors":"Anthony F Jorm","doi":"10.1111/J.2044-835X.1991.TB00888.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The age at which a child first said and read each of 94 picturable nouns was recorded. At ages 9:6 and 11:6, the child was asked to estimate the age she first said these words. Her age-of-acquisition estimates were found to be highly correlated with the actual ages of first saying and reading the words. Age-of-acquisition estimates were also highly stable over the two-year-period. Frequency of saying the words and ease of saying them appeared to be important factors used in making age-of-acquisition judgements. The results support the validity of age-of-acquisition ratings used in memory research.","PeriodicalId":224518,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Development Psychology","volume":"55 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Development Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-835X.1991.TB00888.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

The age at which a child first said and read each of 94 picturable nouns was recorded. At ages 9:6 and 11:6, the child was asked to estimate the age she first said these words. Her age-of-acquisition estimates were found to be highly correlated with the actual ages of first saying and reading the words. Age-of-acquisition estimates were also highly stable over the two-year-period. Frequency of saying the words and ease of saying them appeared to be important factors used in making age-of-acquisition judgements. The results support the validity of age-of-acquisition ratings used in memory research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
词汇习得年龄评分的有效性:儿童词汇知识的纵向研究
记录了孩子第一次说和读94个可描绘名词的年龄。在9:6和11:6岁时,孩子被要求估计她第一次说这些话的年龄。她对习得年龄的估计与第一次说和读单词的实际年龄高度相关。在两年的时间里,用户获取年龄的估计也非常稳定。说这些词的频率和说这些词的难易程度似乎是做出习得年龄判断的重要因素。研究结果支持了记忆研究中使用的习得年龄评分的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developmental differences in the use of task goals in a cued version of the stroop task: Use of task goals Is there an alternative to simulation and theory in understanding the mind Implicit and Explicit Motor Learning in Children with and without Down's Syndrome. Parents, parenting, and children's sleep problems: Exploring reciprocal effects Can Children Construct Inverse Relations in Arithmetic? Evidence for Individual Differences in the Development of Conceptual Understanding and Computational Skill.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1