The Performance of Hematological Parameters for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Children

S. Supangat, A. Makhmudi, Azka Darajat, E. N. Sakinah, Muhammad Yuda Nugraha, A. Tohari, Tegar Syaiful Qodar, Bagus Wahyu Mulyono
{"title":"The Performance of Hematological Parameters for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Children","authors":"S. Supangat, A. Makhmudi, Azka Darajat, E. N. Sakinah, Muhammad Yuda Nugraha, A. Tohari, Tegar Syaiful Qodar, Bagus Wahyu Mulyono","doi":"10.19184/ams.v8i1.25715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis is still difficult to make and 30-40% of cases do not show typical classic symptoms. The negative appendectomy rate and the risk of perforation reach 20% so that new, easy, inexpensive and accurate additional examination is needed. This study aimed to compare platelet distribution width (PDW) and mean platelet volume (MPV) values of appendicitis and control patients. This study is retrospective case control study. Differences in MPV and PDW levels in patients with appendicitis and controls were analyzed with a t-test and determination of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the two markers in appendicitis diagnosis were performed by ROC analysis The mean MPV appendicitis was significantly lower (p <0.05) compared to controls (8.3 ± 1.9; 9.2 ± 1.5) while PDW of appendicitis patients did not differ significantly from controls (10.4 ± 1, 4, 10.7 ± 2.4; p> 0.05). AUC MPV as a diagnostic tool for appendicitis 0.619 with a normal limit of 6.6 fl has a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 30%. MPV can be used for the diagnosis of appendicitis with a normal limit of 6.6 fl having a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 30%. There was no significant difference between PDW of appendicitis patients with controls. There was no significant difference between MPV levels of patients with simple appendicitis and complications. \n Keywords: Appendicitis, MPV, PDW, Platelet","PeriodicalId":246242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine and Medical Sciences","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agromedicine and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/ams.v8i1.25715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis is still difficult to make and 30-40% of cases do not show typical classic symptoms. The negative appendectomy rate and the risk of perforation reach 20% so that new, easy, inexpensive and accurate additional examination is needed. This study aimed to compare platelet distribution width (PDW) and mean platelet volume (MPV) values of appendicitis and control patients. This study is retrospective case control study. Differences in MPV and PDW levels in patients with appendicitis and controls were analyzed with a t-test and determination of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the two markers in appendicitis diagnosis were performed by ROC analysis The mean MPV appendicitis was significantly lower (p <0.05) compared to controls (8.3 ± 1.9; 9.2 ± 1.5) while PDW of appendicitis patients did not differ significantly from controls (10.4 ± 1, 4, 10.7 ± 2.4; p> 0.05). AUC MPV as a diagnostic tool for appendicitis 0.619 with a normal limit of 6.6 fl has a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 30%. MPV can be used for the diagnosis of appendicitis with a normal limit of 6.6 fl having a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 30%. There was no significant difference between PDW of appendicitis patients with controls. There was no significant difference between MPV levels of patients with simple appendicitis and complications.  Keywords: Appendicitis, MPV, PDW, Platelet
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液学指标在儿童急性阑尾炎诊断中的表现
小儿阑尾炎的早期诊断仍然很困难,30-40%的病例没有表现出典型的典型症状。阑尾切除术阴性率和穿孔风险达20%,需要进行新的、简便、廉价、准确的附加检查。本研究旨在比较阑尾炎患者与对照组的血小板分布宽度(PDW)和平均血小板体积(MPV)值。本研究为回顾性病例对照研究。采用t检验分析阑尾炎患者与对照组MPV、PDW水平的差异,采用ROC分析确定两项指标诊断阑尾炎的敏感性、特异性和准确性。平均MPV较阑尾炎显著降低(p < 0.05)。AUC MPV作为阑尾炎的诊断工具0.619,正常极限为6.6 fl,敏感性为90%,特异性为30%。MPV可用于阑尾炎的诊断,其正常极限为6.6 fl,敏感性为90%,特异性为30%。阑尾炎患者与对照组的PDW差异无统计学意义。单纯性阑尾炎及其并发症患者的MPV水平无显著差异。关键词:阑尾炎,MPV, PDW,血小板
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differences of BUN and Serum Creatinine Values in Severity of Diabetic Ketoacidosis Patients at RSD dr. Seobandi Jember Risk Factor Analysis of Work Fatigue on Online Motorcycle Taxi Drivers in Jember Region Coverage and Factors Related to Early Breastfeeding Initiation in Nusa Tenggara The Effectiveness of Roselle Kombucha Tea in Increasing Haemoglobin Levels Mice (Mus imusculus) With Anaemic Caregiving Burden in Family Caregivers Of Patients With Schizophrenia Post-Pasung in Jember
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1