Virtual general surgery teaching for higher surgical trainees in the UK

JW O'Brien, M. Natarajan, S. Williams, N. Obeid, S. Tucker, W. Hawkins
{"title":"Virtual general surgery teaching for higher surgical trainees in the UK","authors":"JW O'Brien, M. Natarajan, S. Williams, N. Obeid, S. Tucker, W. Hawkins","doi":"10.1308/rcsbull.tb2023.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2020, postgraduate medical education has increasingly incorporated virtual teaching. In the Kent, Surrey and Sussex Deanery, teaching over 15 months was delivered via Zoom, with a secure recording provided retrospectively, covering the general surgery curriculum for higher specialty trainees. The primary aim of this study was to describe learner feedback. The secondary aim was to compare virtual with in-person teaching, with a view to guiding future teaching strategies. Prospective feedback via Likert-rating satisfaction was combined with a summative web survey at close of programme (delivered during 2020-2021). Twenty-four (63%) of thirty-eight trainees responded. Live Zoom attendance and retrospective YouTube views were analysed. A literature search compared the results with existing studies that describe virtual surgical teaching. Two-thirds (69%) of participants were satisfied with the programme, no trainees were dissatisfied and 42% preferred virtual to in-person teaching. Satisfaction at close of programme was high (4.33/5) and not significantly different from satisfaction at the start of the programme (4.84/5). The majority (88%) found it relevant to career development. Commute and personal responsibilities were identified as barriers to virtual teaching, and there was no correlation between live and retrospective views. Three-quarters (79%) of trainees found virtual teaching at least as satisfactory as in-person teaching. Satisfaction was maintained throughout the virtual programme, rated as better or at least as good as in-person teaching. However, reduced provision of in-person education during the study period confounds this feedback. There appears to be benefit in virtual surgical teaching but a blended approach is likely to be increasingly employed.","PeriodicalId":258157,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsbull.tb2023.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2020, postgraduate medical education has increasingly incorporated virtual teaching. In the Kent, Surrey and Sussex Deanery, teaching over 15 months was delivered via Zoom, with a secure recording provided retrospectively, covering the general surgery curriculum for higher specialty trainees. The primary aim of this study was to describe learner feedback. The secondary aim was to compare virtual with in-person teaching, with a view to guiding future teaching strategies. Prospective feedback via Likert-rating satisfaction was combined with a summative web survey at close of programme (delivered during 2020-2021). Twenty-four (63%) of thirty-eight trainees responded. Live Zoom attendance and retrospective YouTube views were analysed. A literature search compared the results with existing studies that describe virtual surgical teaching. Two-thirds (69%) of participants were satisfied with the programme, no trainees were dissatisfied and 42% preferred virtual to in-person teaching. Satisfaction at close of programme was high (4.33/5) and not significantly different from satisfaction at the start of the programme (4.84/5). The majority (88%) found it relevant to career development. Commute and personal responsibilities were identified as barriers to virtual teaching, and there was no correlation between live and retrospective views. Three-quarters (79%) of trainees found virtual teaching at least as satisfactory as in-person teaching. Satisfaction was maintained throughout the virtual programme, rated as better or at least as good as in-person teaching. However, reduced provision of in-person education during the study period confounds this feedback. There appears to be benefit in virtual surgical teaching but a blended approach is likely to be increasingly employed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国高等外科培训生虚拟普外科教学
自2020年以来,研究生医学教育越来越多地采用虚拟教学。在肯特郡、萨里郡和苏塞克斯郡的院长办公室,超过15个月的教学是通过Zoom进行的,并提供了一个安全的回顾性记录,涵盖了高等专科学员的普外科课程。本研究的主要目的是描述学习者的反馈。第二个目的是比较虚拟教学和面对面教学,以期指导未来的教学策略。通过李克特评级满意度的前瞻性反馈与课程结束时(2020-2021年期间交付)的总结性网络调查相结合。38名受训者中有24人(63%)做出了回应。Live Zoom的出勤率和YouTube的回顾浏览量进行了分析。文献检索将结果与描述虚拟外科教学的现有研究进行了比较。三分之二(69%)的参与者对课程感到满意,没有学员不满意,42%的人更喜欢虚拟教学而不是面对面教学。课程结束时的满意度较高(4.33/5),与课程开始时的满意度(4.84/5)无显著差异。大多数人(88%)认为这与职业发展有关。通勤和个人责任被认为是虚拟教学的障碍,并且现场和回顾性观点之间没有相关性。四分之三(79%)的受训者认为虚拟教学至少和面对面教学一样令人满意。在整个虚拟课程中,满意度保持不变,被评为更好或至少与面对面教学一样好。然而,在研究期间,面对面教育的减少使这种反馈变得混乱。虚拟外科教学似乎有好处,但一种混合的方法可能会越来越多地被采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Volunteers at the RCS England museums Will artificial intelligence lead to new jobs in healthcare? An interview with Miss Samantha Tross Your College wants you! Diabetes in the UK: a volunteer spreading awareness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1