Contractual Obligations in Financing with Fiduciary Security in Indonesia in the Context of Justice

T. Bahar, T. Kamello, Suhaidi Suhadi, Saidin Saidin, Rio Hilmawan Bagas Trihasworo
{"title":"Contractual Obligations in Financing with Fiduciary Security in Indonesia in the Context of Justice","authors":"T. Bahar, T. Kamello, Suhaidi Suhadi, Saidin Saidin, Rio Hilmawan Bagas Trihasworo","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v7i1.69318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financing with fiduciary security is a popular form of financing in Indonesia. However, in the context of justice, there are several aspects that need to be considered regarding this contractual arrangement. This research aims to discuss the study of contractual obligations in financing with fiduciary security in Indonesia within the context of justice, with a focus on relevant aspects both theories and practices. This research intends to analyze the contractual obligations in financing with fiduciary security within the context of justice in Indonesia. The research revealed that financing with fiduciary security in Indonesia presents several justice-related issues. Firstly, there is an imbalance of power between the fiduciary giver (creditor) and the fiduciary receiver (debtor). The fiduciary giver tends to hold a stronger position in executing fiduciary security, while the fiduciary receiver may face difficulties in protecting their rights. Secondly, consumer protection or debtor protection in financing with fiduciary security is still inadequate. Although there are regulations in place governing debtor rights, their implementation remains limited. This can lead to injustice for financially vulnerable debtors who are unable to fulfill their payment obligations. Thirdly, dispute resolution regarding financing with fiduciary security tends to favor the fiduciary giver. Lengthy legal proceedings and high costs can impede debtors from achieving justice. Moreover, the lack of understanding and awareness among the public regarding their rights in financing with fiduciary security can also be problematic.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Scientia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i1.69318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Financing with fiduciary security is a popular form of financing in Indonesia. However, in the context of justice, there are several aspects that need to be considered regarding this contractual arrangement. This research aims to discuss the study of contractual obligations in financing with fiduciary security in Indonesia within the context of justice, with a focus on relevant aspects both theories and practices. This research intends to analyze the contractual obligations in financing with fiduciary security within the context of justice in Indonesia. The research revealed that financing with fiduciary security in Indonesia presents several justice-related issues. Firstly, there is an imbalance of power between the fiduciary giver (creditor) and the fiduciary receiver (debtor). The fiduciary giver tends to hold a stronger position in executing fiduciary security, while the fiduciary receiver may face difficulties in protecting their rights. Secondly, consumer protection or debtor protection in financing with fiduciary security is still inadequate. Although there are regulations in place governing debtor rights, their implementation remains limited. This can lead to injustice for financially vulnerable debtors who are unable to fulfill their payment obligations. Thirdly, dispute resolution regarding financing with fiduciary security tends to favor the fiduciary giver. Lengthy legal proceedings and high costs can impede debtors from achieving justice. Moreover, the lack of understanding and awareness among the public regarding their rights in financing with fiduciary security can also be problematic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
司法背景下印尼信托担保融资中的合同义务
信托担保融资是印尼一种流行的融资形式。但是,在司法方面,关于这一合同安排有几个方面需要考虑。本研究旨在讨论印度尼西亚在司法背景下的信托担保融资合同义务研究,重点关注理论和实践的相关方面。本研究旨在分析印尼司法背景下信托担保融资的合同义务。研究表明,印度尼西亚的信托担保融资存在几个与司法有关的问题。首先,受托人(债权人)和受托人(债务人)之间存在权力失衡。信义给付人在履行信义担保时往往处于更有利的地位,而信义受权人在权利保护方面可能面临困难。其次,信托担保融资中的消费者保护或债务人保护仍然不足。虽然有关于债务人权利的条例,但其执行仍然有限。这可能导致无法履行付款义务的财务脆弱的债务人受到不公正待遇。第三,信义担保融资纠纷的解决倾向于信义给予方。冗长的法律程序和高昂的费用可能阻碍债务人实现正义。此外,公众对其在信托担保融资方面的权利缺乏理解和认识也可能造成问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Positivization of Fatwas of the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council in the Sharia Banking Law: Problems and Challenges Land Subsidence Policy in the Context of Good Governance Principles (Comparing Indonesia and Japan) Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Vietnam’s New Generation Free Trade Agreements – Challenges and Recommendations Rejection of Former Shia Community in Sampang Perspective on Human Rights Law: Discourse of Religious Rights and Freedom in Indonesia Comparative Analysis Between Employees Provident Fund (EPF) & Private Retirement Scheme (PRS) in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1