The Philosophical Thought of Ji Kang

Liu Kang-de
{"title":"The Philosophical Thought of Ji Kang","authors":"Liu Kang-de","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467190164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ji Kang (224-263) was a great writer and thinker of the Wei-Jin period. He said that he was \"indebted to Laozi and Zhuangzi\" (Poems of Hidden Anger [Youfenshi]), and that \"Laozi and Zhuangzi are my teachers\" (\"Letter Breaking with Shan Juyuan\" [Yu Shan Juyuan juejiao yishu]). But unlike He Yan and Wang Bi, Ji Kang did not accept Laozi's idea that \"Being comes from Nonbeing.\" He did not take the mental construct of \"Nonbeing\" as the source or origin of the universe, nor did he, as some comrades suggest, take the material, physical \"qi\" (material force) as the foundation of the existence of all things in the universe. In Ji Kang's view, \"Where is this Being and Nonbeing?\" That is, why should we conceive of \"Being\" or \"Nonbeing\" as the source or origin of the universe? He proposed transcending totally the mysticism of \"Being\" and \"Nonbeing.\" The present article will discuss a few aspects of this question.","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467190164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ji Kang (224-263) was a great writer and thinker of the Wei-Jin period. He said that he was "indebted to Laozi and Zhuangzi" (Poems of Hidden Anger [Youfenshi]), and that "Laozi and Zhuangzi are my teachers" ("Letter Breaking with Shan Juyuan" [Yu Shan Juyuan juejiao yishu]). But unlike He Yan and Wang Bi, Ji Kang did not accept Laozi's idea that "Being comes from Nonbeing." He did not take the mental construct of "Nonbeing" as the source or origin of the universe, nor did he, as some comrades suggest, take the material, physical "qi" (material force) as the foundation of the existence of all things in the universe. In Ji Kang's view, "Where is this Being and Nonbeing?" That is, why should we conceive of "Being" or "Nonbeing" as the source or origin of the universe? He proposed transcending totally the mysticism of "Being" and "Nonbeing." The present article will discuss a few aspects of this question.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嵇康的哲学思想
嵇康(224-263)是魏晋时期伟大的文学家和思想家。他说他“感谢老子和庄子”(《隐怒诗》),说“老子和庄子是我的老师”(《与单居远断信》[于单居远绝交亦舒])。但与何言、王弼不同的是,嵇康并不接受老子“非有而有”的思想。他没有把“无”的心理构念当作宇宙的本源,也没有像有些同志说的那样,把物质的、物理的“气”(物质力)当作宇宙万物存在的基础。在嵇康看来,“有与无在哪里?”也就是说,为什么我们要把“存在”或“不存在”想象成宇宙的源头或起源?他主张彻底超越“有”与“无”的神秘主义。本文将讨论这个问题的几个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adhering to the Criterion of Practice, Regaining an Understanding of Socialism The Law of Sufficlent Reason is an Important Law of Formal Logic Uphold Theories of Development and Oppose Theories of Stagnation The Structure of Color Language Comrade, Master/Teacher, Mister, and Boss
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1