{"title":"Kinematic Slip Model of the 2021 M 6.0 Antelope Valley, California, Earthquake","authors":"F. Pollitz, C. Wicks, W. Hammond","doi":"10.1785/0320210043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We present a kinematic slip model of the 8 July 2021 Antelope Valley earthquake from a finite-source inversion based on regional seismic waveforms and static offsets from Global Positioning System (GPS) and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR). Seismic waveforms are employed at 6 s dominant period out to 100 km from the epicenter, and the combined GPS and InSAR datasets cover the near field and far field out to ∼100 km and constrain the overall rupture size. The aftershock pattern defines a nearly north-striking, 50° east-dipping fault plane. We find a unilateral rupture along this fault plane propagating southward and updip with predominantly normal slip up to ∼1.5 m. The estimated seismic moment of 8.47×1017 N·m is equivalent to Mw 5.92. A finite-source inversion that retains seismic waveforms and GPS static offsets but omits InSAR range changes yields a seismic moment of 1.08×1018 N·m (Mw 5.99). Despite vigorous aftershock activity between 10 km and Earth’s surface, coseismic slip is concentrated in the depth interval 7–10 km.","PeriodicalId":273018,"journal":{"name":"The Seismic Record","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Seismic Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0320210043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
We present a kinematic slip model of the 8 July 2021 Antelope Valley earthquake from a finite-source inversion based on regional seismic waveforms and static offsets from Global Positioning System (GPS) and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR). Seismic waveforms are employed at 6 s dominant period out to 100 km from the epicenter, and the combined GPS and InSAR datasets cover the near field and far field out to ∼100 km and constrain the overall rupture size. The aftershock pattern defines a nearly north-striking, 50° east-dipping fault plane. We find a unilateral rupture along this fault plane propagating southward and updip with predominantly normal slip up to ∼1.5 m. The estimated seismic moment of 8.47×1017 N·m is equivalent to Mw 5.92. A finite-source inversion that retains seismic waveforms and GPS static offsets but omits InSAR range changes yields a seismic moment of 1.08×1018 N·m (Mw 5.99). Despite vigorous aftershock activity between 10 km and Earth’s surface, coseismic slip is concentrated in the depth interval 7–10 km.