Moral Sensitivity of Young People with Intellectual Disability – Its Role in The Process of Their Education

W. Otrębski, Agnieszka Czusz-Sudoł
{"title":"Moral Sensitivity of Young People with Intellectual Disability – Its Role in The Process of Their Education","authors":"W. Otrębski, Agnieszka Czusz-Sudoł","doi":"10.31757/euer.512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Heller and Życiński (1980) the primary regulator of human behaviour is the system of values therefore its development should be in the centre of all educational and upbringing measures. Our focus here is on moral sensitivity understood as the ability of an individual to see social situations from the perspective of moral good and moral evil that represent values embodied in moral norms adopted by the world and internalised by humans as the principles of conduct. The main research question was the following: How morally sensitive are persons with ID and how is their sensitivity associated with the degree of intellectual disability and gender? A non-probability sample 267 of Polish residents aged 16-30 years with mild (58.42%) or moderate (41.58%) intellectual disability was assembled. Men and women were almost in equal proportion. The Moral Sensitivity Inventory (MSI; Otrębski, Sudoł, 2020) has been used to measure the moral sensitivity of people with ID. It consists of 10 illustrated stories presenting typical social situations containing moral dilemmas, and an evaluation form. The tested person’s task is to answer the following question “Who, in this story, did something right or wrong, and what was that?” and to indicate as many moral elements in the story and the picture as they can. The results imply that the study participants had different ability to discern moral good and moral evil. They were more sensitive to the manifestations of good and evil bad associated with Understanding one’s behaviour and its impact on others (more than one-fourth of them had high scores) and less perceptive of those relating to Respect for others’ property and Conformance to principles and norms. The results of the study expand the knowledge of the overall moral sensitivity of persons with intellectual disabilities.","PeriodicalId":307289,"journal":{"name":"The European Educational Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Educational Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to Heller and Życiński (1980) the primary regulator of human behaviour is the system of values therefore its development should be in the centre of all educational and upbringing measures. Our focus here is on moral sensitivity understood as the ability of an individual to see social situations from the perspective of moral good and moral evil that represent values embodied in moral norms adopted by the world and internalised by humans as the principles of conduct. The main research question was the following: How morally sensitive are persons with ID and how is their sensitivity associated with the degree of intellectual disability and gender? A non-probability sample 267 of Polish residents aged 16-30 years with mild (58.42%) or moderate (41.58%) intellectual disability was assembled. Men and women were almost in equal proportion. The Moral Sensitivity Inventory (MSI; Otrębski, Sudoł, 2020) has been used to measure the moral sensitivity of people with ID. It consists of 10 illustrated stories presenting typical social situations containing moral dilemmas, and an evaluation form. The tested person’s task is to answer the following question “Who, in this story, did something right or wrong, and what was that?” and to indicate as many moral elements in the story and the picture as they can. The results imply that the study participants had different ability to discern moral good and moral evil. They were more sensitive to the manifestations of good and evil bad associated with Understanding one’s behaviour and its impact on others (more than one-fourth of them had high scores) and less perceptive of those relating to Respect for others’ property and Conformance to principles and norms. The results of the study expand the knowledge of the overall moral sensitivity of persons with intellectual disabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智障青少年的道德敏感性及其在教育过程中的作用
根据Heller和Życiński(1980)的观点,人类行为的主要调节器是价值体系,因此它的发展应该是所有教育和养育措施的中心。我们这里的重点是道德敏感性,它被理解为个人从道德善和道德恶的角度看待社会状况的能力,道德善和道德恶代表了体现在世界所采用的道德规范中的价值观,并被人类内化为行为原则。主要的研究问题是:有本我身份的人在道德上有多敏感?他们的敏感与智力残疾程度和性别有什么关系?我们收集了267名16-30岁波兰居民的非概率样本,他们有轻度智力残疾(58.42%)或中度智力残疾(41.58%)。男性和女性的比例几乎相等。道德敏感性量表;Otrębski, sudokov, 2020)被用来衡量有身份证的人的道德敏感性。它由10个带有道德困境的典型社会情境的插图故事和一个评价表组成。被测试者的任务是回答以下问题:“在这个故事中,谁做了对或错的事情,是什么?”并在故事和画面中尽可能多地指出道德因素。结果表明,研究对象对道德善与道德恶的辨别能力存在差异。他们对善恶的表现更敏感,这与理解一个人的行为及其对他人的影响有关(超过四分之一的人得分很高),而对尊重他人财产和遵守原则和规范的表现则不那么敏感。研究结果拓展了对智障人士整体道德敏感度的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Read less, learn more. Teach epistemic humility. Gender differences in entrepreneurship studies The effects of physical activity on cognitive and learning abilities in childhood Teacher Interventions using Guided Discovery and Mathematical Modelling in Grade 10 Financial Mathematics Embracing the Future: AI's Transformative Potential in Educational Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1