Causal Attribution Dimensions and Adjustment To Sport Injury

B. Brewer
{"title":"Causal Attribution Dimensions and Adjustment To Sport Injury","authors":"B. Brewer","doi":"10.1080/10811449908409730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A study of 31 patients (20 males and 11 females) at a sports medicine clinic who attributed their injuries to overtraining or overuse was conducted to examine the relationship between causal attribution dimensions and psychological adjustment to sport injury. Participants completed a battery of questionnaires that included the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and an attribution measure in which participants were asked to identify the main cause of their injuries and to rate the perceived cause of injury in terms of internality, stability, and globality dimensions. The attribu-tional dimensions accounted for 55% of the variance (p < .0005) in POMS total mood disturbance (TMD) scores. Internality (ft =– .38, p < .01) and stability (ft = –.58, p < .0005) were inversely related to TMD. These findings were essentially the same when statistically controlling for injury duration, injury severity, and injury status. The findings suggest that attributing overuse injuries to internal and stable factors may ha...","PeriodicalId":343335,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personal & Interpersonal Loss","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personal & Interpersonal Loss","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811449908409730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Abstract A study of 31 patients (20 males and 11 females) at a sports medicine clinic who attributed their injuries to overtraining or overuse was conducted to examine the relationship between causal attribution dimensions and psychological adjustment to sport injury. Participants completed a battery of questionnaires that included the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and an attribution measure in which participants were asked to identify the main cause of their injuries and to rate the perceived cause of injury in terms of internality, stability, and globality dimensions. The attribu-tional dimensions accounted for 55% of the variance (p < .0005) in POMS total mood disturbance (TMD) scores. Internality (ft =– .38, p < .01) and stability (ft = –.58, p < .0005) were inversely related to TMD. These findings were essentially the same when statistically controlling for injury duration, injury severity, and injury status. The findings suggest that attributing overuse injuries to internal and stable factors may ha...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动损伤的因果归因维度与调整
摘要对31例因过度训练或过度使用导致损伤的运动医学门诊患者(男20例,女11例)进行研究,探讨运动损伤的因果归因维度与心理适应的关系。参与者完成了一系列问卷调查,其中包括情绪状态概况(POMS)和归因测量,参与者被要求确定他们受伤的主要原因,并根据内部性、稳定性和整体性维度对受伤的感知原因进行评级。归因维度占POMS总情绪障碍(TMD)得分方差的55% (p < .0005)。内在性(ft = - 0.38, p < 0.01)和稳定性(ft = - 0.38, p < 0.01)。58, p < .0005)与TMD呈负相关。在统计上控制损伤持续时间、损伤严重程度和损伤状态时,这些发现基本上是相同的。研究结果表明,将过度使用损伤归因于内部和稳定的因素可能……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Living With The Facts, Negotiating The Terms: Unrealistic Beliefs, Denial, and Adjustment In The First Year Of Acquired Physical Disability The Relationships among Differing Loss Experiences, Adjustment, Beliefs, and Coping. Attitudes Toward Euthanasia and Justifying Reasons Of Elderly Israelis and Their Family Members Motherloss: An Adult Daughter's Depth Perspective Sawdust for Brains: Definition and Disconfirmation after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1