A Systematic Assessment Framework for Higher-Education Institutions

Munikrishnappa Anilkumar, C. Singai, A. Ramaprasad
{"title":"A Systematic Assessment Framework for Higher-Education Institutions","authors":"Munikrishnappa Anilkumar, C. Singai, A. Ramaprasad","doi":"10.4995/head20.2020.11102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The multiple criteria of ranking, rating and accrediting the higher education institutions in India and across globe have become de facto lens for viewing the institutions. There is an increasing number of assessment systems carried down by multiple agencies, with the public policy emphasis on higher education institutions getting assessed, it is necessary to use a systematic and systemic framework that is comprehensive for assessment. For this purpose, the paper proposes an ontological framework for assessment of higher education institutions.  The ontology’s dimensions, sub-dimensions, and their constituent elements are derived from higher-education assessment systems that are well known globally and in India. The framework can help higher-education institutions: (a) assess themselves systemically and systematically; (b) highlight the bright, light, blind, and blank spots in their performance; and (c) correct their trajectory to fulfil their vision. Such framework would assist in identifying the gaps and pathways to improve their position in assessments.","PeriodicalId":351217,"journal":{"name":"6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'20)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'20)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/head20.2020.11102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The multiple criteria of ranking, rating and accrediting the higher education institutions in India and across globe have become de facto lens for viewing the institutions. There is an increasing number of assessment systems carried down by multiple agencies, with the public policy emphasis on higher education institutions getting assessed, it is necessary to use a systematic and systemic framework that is comprehensive for assessment. For this purpose, the paper proposes an ontological framework for assessment of higher education institutions.  The ontology’s dimensions, sub-dimensions, and their constituent elements are derived from higher-education assessment systems that are well known globally and in India. The framework can help higher-education institutions: (a) assess themselves systemically and systematically; (b) highlight the bright, light, blind, and blank spots in their performance; and (c) correct their trajectory to fulfil their vision. Such framework would assist in identifying the gaps and pathways to improve their position in assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等院校系统评估框架
印度和全球高等教育机构的排名、评级和认证的多重标准已经成为观察这些机构的事实上的镜头。由多个机构执行的评估体系越来越多,随着公共政策对高等教育机构评估的重视,有必要使用一个系统的、系统的、全面的评估框架。为此,本文提出了一个高等教育机构评估的本体论框架。本体论的维度、子维度及其组成元素来源于全球和印度知名的高等教育评估系统。该框架可以帮助高等教育机构:(a)系统和系统地评估自己;(b)突出表现中的亮点、亮点、盲点和空白点;(c)纠正他们的轨迹以实现他们的愿景。这种框架将有助于查明差距和途径,以改善它们在评估中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
European Joint Doctorates: myth or reality? Planned Chaos in Electrical Engineering Education Did the Bologna Process contribute to improving international students’ success rates in Germany’s HEIs? Twenty years of success rates in Germany: how the Bologna Process impacts on the success rates of International and German students. Integrated disciplines and future competencies: A blueprint for ethically aligned curriculum for IT, CS, ITC & beyond Learning Outside the Classroom: A Distinctive Approach to Co-Curricular Recognition in the Australian context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1