Motivation of application, analysis and inconsistencies standard GOST R 56002-2014 “evaluation of experience and business reputation of the construction organizations”
P. Lontsikh, E. Y. Drolova, E. A. Vovseenko, E. Kunakov, I. I. Livshitz, Ksenia A. Nikiforova, Arkady V. Vladimirchev
{"title":"Motivation of application, analysis and inconsistencies standard GOST R 56002-2014 “evaluation of experience and business reputation of the construction organizations”","authors":"P. Lontsikh, E. Y. Drolova, E. A. Vovseenko, E. Kunakov, I. I. Livshitz, Ksenia A. Nikiforova, Arkady V. Vladimirchev","doi":"10.1109/ITMQIS.2016.7751922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In accordance with Federal law N244-“About contract system in the procurement of goods, works and services for state and municipal needs” customers are given the opportunity to consider the factors of experience and reputation in the selection of the contractor in the implementation of procurement within the “business criteria reputation “procurement participant. The normative basis for the evaluation of business entities, based on an assessment of their financial performance, resource availability, human resources potential, quality of management decisions is the standard GOST R 56002-2014 “Evaluation of experience and business reputation of the construction companies.” An analysis of the practice of GOST R 56002-2014 identified a number of shortcomings, which can significantly distort the final results of rating. The article presents the results of the standard in the process of appraisal activity AS “Russian Register”, registered as a certification body for voluntary certification systems in the Register Rosstandart.","PeriodicalId":330739,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Conference on Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies (IT&MQ&IS)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Conference on Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies (IT&MQ&IS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITMQIS.2016.7751922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In accordance with Federal law N244-“About contract system in the procurement of goods, works and services for state and municipal needs” customers are given the opportunity to consider the factors of experience and reputation in the selection of the contractor in the implementation of procurement within the “business criteria reputation “procurement participant. The normative basis for the evaluation of business entities, based on an assessment of their financial performance, resource availability, human resources potential, quality of management decisions is the standard GOST R 56002-2014 “Evaluation of experience and business reputation of the construction companies.” An analysis of the practice of GOST R 56002-2014 identified a number of shortcomings, which can significantly distort the final results of rating. The article presents the results of the standard in the process of appraisal activity AS “Russian Register”, registered as a certification body for voluntary certification systems in the Register Rosstandart.
根据联邦法律N244-“关于为国家和市政需要采购货物、工程和服务的合同制度”,客户有机会在选择承包商时考虑经验和声誉因素,在“商业标准声誉”采购参与者的范围内实施采购。对商业实体进行评价的规范性依据是GOST R 56002-2014标准《建筑公司经验和商业信誉评价》,该标准基于对其财务绩效、资源可用性、人力资源潜力、管理决策质量的评估。对GOST R 56002-2014实践的分析发现了一些缺点,这些缺点可能会严重扭曲评级的最终结果。本文介绍了该标准在评估活动过程中的结果,作为“俄罗斯注册”,在注册俄罗斯标准中注册为自愿认证体系的认证机构。