Reagan, rhetoric, and the public philosophy: Ethics and politics in the 1984 campaign

C. Johnstone
{"title":"Reagan, rhetoric, and the public philosophy: Ethics and politics in the 1984 campaign","authors":"C. Johnstone","doi":"10.1080/10417949509372967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethical analysis of Ronald Reagan's rhetorical practice enables us to bring order to our recent political history. His 1984 campaign for re‐election is especially fitting as a vehicle for this analysis because Reagan is fundamentally a campaigner and because the campaign centered on normative issues. Appropriate ethical standards are grounded in the values and procedures of democratic decision making. When appraised by these standards—rules of disclosure, argument, confrontation, and public competence—the Reagan campaign is found deficient in upholding principles that undergird the political system within which he operated, and upon which the election process depends for its legitimacy and efficacy.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949509372967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Ethical analysis of Ronald Reagan's rhetorical practice enables us to bring order to our recent political history. His 1984 campaign for re‐election is especially fitting as a vehicle for this analysis because Reagan is fundamentally a campaigner and because the campaign centered on normative issues. Appropriate ethical standards are grounded in the values and procedures of democratic decision making. When appraised by these standards—rules of disclosure, argument, confrontation, and public competence—the Reagan campaign is found deficient in upholding principles that undergird the political system within which he operated, and upon which the election process depends for its legitimacy and efficacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《里根、修辞与公共哲学:1984年竞选中的道德与政治》
对罗纳德·里根的修辞实践进行伦理分析,使我们能够为我们最近的政治史带来秩序。他1984年的竞选连任特别适合作为这种分析的载体,因为里根本质上是一个竞选者,因为竞选活动以规范问题为中心。适当的道德标准是以民主决策的价值和程序为基础的。当用这些标准——披露、争论、对抗和公共能力的规则——来评价里根的竞选活动时,人们发现他在坚持他所处的政治体系的基础原则方面存在缺陷,而这些原则正是选举过程的合法性和有效性所依赖的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radio in a world at war Dramatic criticism 1 Attention forensics coaches Students’ perceptions of effective and ineffective communication by college teachers The woven gender: made for a woman, but stronger for a man
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1