Machine learning portfolios with equal risk contributions: evidence from the Brazilian market

Alexandre Rubesam
{"title":"Machine learning portfolios with equal risk contributions: evidence from the Brazilian market","authors":"Alexandre Rubesam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3432760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use machine learning methods to forecast individual stock returns in the Brazilian stock market, using a unique data set including technical and fundamental predictors. We find that portfolios formed on the highest quintile of predicted returns significantly outperform market benchmarks. However, portfolios formed on the lowest quintile of predicted returns earn positive returns and have high volatilities, making traditional long-short strategies unnatractive. To resolve this problem, we propose an equal risk contribution (ERC) ensemble approach to build a portfolio combining long-short portfolios obtained with various machine learning methods such that (i) the risk contributions of all individual long-short portfolios are equal, and (ii) the aggregate risk contribution of all long positions equals that of all short positions. The ERC ensemble portfolio outperforms, on an after cost, risk-adjusted basis, all individual machine learning long-short portfolios, as well as equally-weighted ensembles of these portfolios.","PeriodicalId":108284,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: International Financial Markets - Emerging Markets eJournal","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: International Financial Markets - Emerging Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3432760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

We use machine learning methods to forecast individual stock returns in the Brazilian stock market, using a unique data set including technical and fundamental predictors. We find that portfolios formed on the highest quintile of predicted returns significantly outperform market benchmarks. However, portfolios formed on the lowest quintile of predicted returns earn positive returns and have high volatilities, making traditional long-short strategies unnatractive. To resolve this problem, we propose an equal risk contribution (ERC) ensemble approach to build a portfolio combining long-short portfolios obtained with various machine learning methods such that (i) the risk contributions of all individual long-short portfolios are equal, and (ii) the aggregate risk contribution of all long positions equals that of all short positions. The ERC ensemble portfolio outperforms, on an after cost, risk-adjusted basis, all individual machine learning long-short portfolios, as well as equally-weighted ensembles of these portfolios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有同等风险贡献的机器学习投资组合:来自巴西市场的证据
我们使用机器学习方法来预测巴西股市的个股回报,使用独特的数据集,包括技术和基本面预测。我们发现,在预测回报率最高的五分之一上形成的投资组合,其表现明显优于市场基准。然而,在预测回报率最低的五分之一上形成的投资组合获得了正回报,并具有高波动性,这使得传统的多空策略失去了吸引力。为了解决这一问题,我们提出了一种等风险贡献(ERC)集成方法,将各种机器学习方法获得的多空组合组合在一起,构建一个投资组合,使(i)所有单个多空组合的风险贡献相等,(ii)所有多头头寸的总风险贡献等于所有空头头寸的风险贡献。在成本和风险调整后的基础上,ERC集成投资组合的表现优于所有单独的机器学习多空投资组合,以及这些投资组合的同等权重组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognizing Intra-day Patterns of Stock Market Activity FRM Financial Risk Meter for Emerging Markets The Evolution of the Earnings Distribution in a Volatile Economy: Evidence from Argentina The Effects of COVID-19 Spread on the Egyptian Exchange Sectors: Winners and Losers across Time Hierarchical PCA and Modeling Asset Correlations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1