Comparison of the Effectiveness of Compassion-focused Therapy and Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction in Reducing Type D Personality Traits in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease

Maryam Karimi, Seyedeh Zahra Emadi, Yazdan Mohsen Zadeh, Maryam Izanloo
{"title":"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Compassion-focused Therapy and Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction in Reducing Type D Personality Traits in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease","authors":"Maryam Karimi, Seyedeh Zahra Emadi, Yazdan Mohsen Zadeh, Maryam Izanloo","doi":"10.32598/jvc.2.4.58.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Coronary patients with type D personality have high stress and inhibit negative emotions. Despite receiving similar medical procedures as other coronary patients they show a slower recovery process and recurrent heart attacks. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of compassion-focused therapy (CFT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in reducing type D personality traits in patients with coronary heart disease. Materials and Methods: The present research method was quasi-experimental with a pretest- post-test-follow-up design with a control group. The statistical population of this study was all patients with coronary heart disease in Rajai Alborz Hospital in Karaj City, Iran, in 2019. A total of 45 people were selected by convenience sampling and randomly assigned to three groups under the title of CFT, MBSR, and control group. Subjects responded to the type D personality scale by Denollet (2005) for pre-test, post-test, and follow-up. CFT and MBSR were each held in 8 sessions of 90 minutes. In the present study, the statistical method of repeated measure analysis of variance in SPSS software, version 18, was used to analyze the data with 0.05 and 0.01 significance levels. Results: After the intervention, the average score of type D traits symptoms of the test group (73.26 with a standard deviation of 4.49) was significantly lower than the control group (53.36 with a standard deviation of 27.4). CFT and MBSR had a reducing effect on type D personality traits over time (P<0.001). Also, a significant difference was observed between the effectiveness of CFT and MBSR in reducing type D personality traits (P=0.020). Conclusion: CFT and MBSR are both effective in treating patients with type D personality but CFT is more effective.","PeriodicalId":318985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vessels and Circulation","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vessels and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jvc.2.4.58.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: Coronary patients with type D personality have high stress and inhibit negative emotions. Despite receiving similar medical procedures as other coronary patients they show a slower recovery process and recurrent heart attacks. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of compassion-focused therapy (CFT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in reducing type D personality traits in patients with coronary heart disease. Materials and Methods: The present research method was quasi-experimental with a pretest- post-test-follow-up design with a control group. The statistical population of this study was all patients with coronary heart disease in Rajai Alborz Hospital in Karaj City, Iran, in 2019. A total of 45 people were selected by convenience sampling and randomly assigned to three groups under the title of CFT, MBSR, and control group. Subjects responded to the type D personality scale by Denollet (2005) for pre-test, post-test, and follow-up. CFT and MBSR were each held in 8 sessions of 90 minutes. In the present study, the statistical method of repeated measure analysis of variance in SPSS software, version 18, was used to analyze the data with 0.05 and 0.01 significance levels. Results: After the intervention, the average score of type D traits symptoms of the test group (73.26 with a standard deviation of 4.49) was significantly lower than the control group (53.36 with a standard deviation of 27.4). CFT and MBSR had a reducing effect on type D personality traits over time (P<0.001). Also, a significant difference was observed between the effectiveness of CFT and MBSR in reducing type D personality traits (P=0.020). Conclusion: CFT and MBSR are both effective in treating patients with type D personality but CFT is more effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以同情为中心的治疗和以正念为基础的减压在降低冠心病患者D型人格特征方面的效果比较
背景与目的:冠状动脉D型人格患者具有较高的压力和抑制负面情绪的能力。尽管接受了与其他冠状动脉患者相似的医疗程序,但他们表现出较慢的恢复过程和复发性心脏病发作。本研究旨在比较以同情为中心的治疗(CFT)和以正念为基础的减压(MBSR)在降低冠心病患者D型人格特征方面的有效性。材料与方法:本研究方法为准实验,采用前测-后测-随访设计,设对照组。本研究的统计人群为2019年伊朗卡拉杰市Rajai Alborz医院的所有冠心病患者。采用方便抽样法,将45人随机分为三组,分别为CFT组、正念减压组和对照组。被试对Denollet(2005)的D型人格量表进行前测、后测和随访。CFT和MBSR各分8次,每次90分钟。本研究采用SPSS软件18版重复测量方差分析的统计方法,对0.05和0.01显著水平的数据进行分析。结果:干预后,试验组D型特征症状平均得分(73.26分,标准差为4.49)显著低于对照组(53.36分,标准差为27.4)。随着时间的推移,CFT和MBSR对D型人格特征有降低作用(P<0.001)。此外,CFT和MBSR在降低D型人格特质方面的效果也有显著差异(P=0.020)。结论:CFT与正念减压法治疗D型人格均有效,但CFT效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Roy Adaptation Model for Patients with Hypertension: A Case Report Examining the Frequency of Port Catheter Complications and the Duration of Its Performance Associated with the Length of the Catheter in Patients with Port Placement Inhibition of Renin-angiotensin System and Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 The Outcomes and Cost of Therapeutic Interventions in Cardiovascular Patients: A Case Study for Application in Cost-Effectiveness Studies Pulmonary Artery Embolism Due to a Ruptured Hepatic Hydatid Cyst Into the Inferior Vena Cava: Clinical and Radiologic Imaging Findings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1