Evaluation of Clinical Follow-Up of The Patients Monitored at Home Due To COVID-19 Pandemic

A. Esen, S. Arıca, Mikail Ozdemir
{"title":"Evaluation of Clinical Follow-Up of The Patients Monitored at Home Due To COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"A. Esen, S. Arıca, Mikail Ozdemir","doi":"10.33880/ejfm.2021100401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The most valuable approach to prevent the spread of the novel COVID-19, which is a pandemic today, is to detect, isolate, and treat patients. The majority of patients are mild or asymptomatic cases. These cases are followed up and isolated at home in many countries. With a governmental decision issued in Turkey, it has been deemed appropriate to follow up the suspected, contact or definitive diagnosis patients who do not indicate inpatient treatment, have a mild clinical course, or do not have a risk factor that may lead to a severe course of COVID-19, at home by the family practice units. In this study, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of the patients with COVID-19 who were being monitored at home.\n\nMethods: The study was designed as a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. In this study, 321 people who were registered at the Education and Family Health Centers of our hospital and followed up as COVID-19 suspects, contacts, or definitive cases were identified. Home follow-up data of these patients between April 1-30 were obtained retrospectively from the records of family health centers. Data, such as the presence and course of symptoms of people followed at home, their isolation status, medicine usage status, and test results were recorded electronically for further analysis. \n\nResults: In this study, 321 patients, 163 (50.28%) males, and 158 (49.22%) females were included. Among 321 patients, 287 (89.41%) were contact patients, 54 (16.82%) were suspected patients, and 28 (8.72%) had a definitive diagnosis. The mean age of the patients was 40.00±20.68. Among the patients included in this study, 27 (8.41%) were hospitalized, symptoms worsened in 8 (2.49%), 5 (1.56%) were re-applied to the hospital, 5 (1.56%) were re-hospitalized, and 28 people (8.72%) were administered medication.\n\nConclusion: The mean age of patients who complied with the measures of isolation was higher than patients who did not. The mean age of hospitalized patients was higher than in non-hospitalized patients. The frequency of observed symptoms was consistent with the previous studies in the literature.\n\nKeywords: cough, fever, pandemics, quarantine, SARS-CoV-2","PeriodicalId":436322,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33880/ejfm.2021100401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: The most valuable approach to prevent the spread of the novel COVID-19, which is a pandemic today, is to detect, isolate, and treat patients. The majority of patients are mild or asymptomatic cases. These cases are followed up and isolated at home in many countries. With a governmental decision issued in Turkey, it has been deemed appropriate to follow up the suspected, contact or definitive diagnosis patients who do not indicate inpatient treatment, have a mild clinical course, or do not have a risk factor that may lead to a severe course of COVID-19, at home by the family practice units. In this study, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of the patients with COVID-19 who were being monitored at home. Methods: The study was designed as a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. In this study, 321 people who were registered at the Education and Family Health Centers of our hospital and followed up as COVID-19 suspects, contacts, or definitive cases were identified. Home follow-up data of these patients between April 1-30 were obtained retrospectively from the records of family health centers. Data, such as the presence and course of symptoms of people followed at home, their isolation status, medicine usage status, and test results were recorded electronically for further analysis. Results: In this study, 321 patients, 163 (50.28%) males, and 158 (49.22%) females were included. Among 321 patients, 287 (89.41%) were contact patients, 54 (16.82%) were suspected patients, and 28 (8.72%) had a definitive diagnosis. The mean age of the patients was 40.00±20.68. Among the patients included in this study, 27 (8.41%) were hospitalized, symptoms worsened in 8 (2.49%), 5 (1.56%) were re-applied to the hospital, 5 (1.56%) were re-hospitalized, and 28 people (8.72%) were administered medication. Conclusion: The mean age of patients who complied with the measures of isolation was higher than patients who did not. The mean age of hospitalized patients was higher than in non-hospitalized patients. The frequency of observed symptoms was consistent with the previous studies in the literature. Keywords: cough, fever, pandemics, quarantine, SARS-CoV-2
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型冠状病毒病疫情居家监测患者临床随访评价
目的:预防新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)传播的最有价值的方法是检测、隔离和治疗患者。大多数患者为轻度或无症状病例。在许多国家,对这些病例进行随访并在家中隔离。土耳其政府发布了一项决定,认为家庭诊所应在家中对不需要住院治疗、临床病程较轻或不存在可能导致COVID-19严重病程的风险因素的疑似患者、接触者或确诊患者进行随访。在本研究中,我们旨在调查在家监测的COVID-19患者的特征。方法:本研究采用回顾性横断面观察性研究。在本研究中,在我院教育和家庭健康中心登记并随访为COVID-19疑似病例、接触者或确诊病例的321人被确定。这些患者4月1日至30日的家庭随访资料回顾性地从家庭保健中心的记录中获得。以电子方式记录数据,如在家中随访的患者的症状和病程、他们的隔离状态、药物使用状况和测试结果,以供进一步分析。结果:本研究共纳入321例患者,其中男性163例(50.28%),女性158例(49.22%)。321例患者中,接触者287例(89.41%),疑似病例54例(16.82%),确诊28例(8.72%)。患者平均年龄40.00±20.68岁。本研究纳入的患者中,住院27例(8.41%),症状加重8例(2.49%),再次住院5例(1.56%),再次住院5例(1.56%),用药28例(8.72%)。结论:遵守隔离措施的患者平均年龄高于未遵守隔离措施的患者。住院患者的平均年龄高于非住院患者。观察到的症状频率与文献中先前的研究一致。关键词:咳嗽、发热、大流行、检疫、SARS-CoV-2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Three Methods, “Pap Smear, Conization and LEEP” in Women with Abnormal Pap Smear: A Ten-Year Retrospective Analytical Study Evaluation of Misbeliefs, Myths and Knowledge About Nevi and Skin Cancer in Dermatology Patients Breastfeeding Problems of Mothers in the Postpartum Period and Impact on Sleep Quality The Relationship of Pain Sensitivity and Severity with Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain The Relationship Between Parents’ Health Literacy Levels and Their Attitudes Towards Human Papillomavirus Vaccination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1