Italian and Australian Local Governments: Balanced Scorecard Practices – A Research Note

Federica Farneti, J. Guthrie
{"title":"Italian and Australian Local Governments: Balanced Scorecard Practices – A Research Note","authors":"Federica Farneti, J. Guthrie","doi":"10.1108/14013380810872743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – New public management changes in both the Australian and Italian government sectors have affected their modus operandi. This research aims to illustrate how the balanced scorecard (BSC) has been used in both Italian and Australian local government organisations (LGO), focusing on implementation and practice.Design/methodology/approach – A case study method is applied which was chosen to illustrate the use of the BSC model in both an Australian and an Italian LGO. These specific organisations were chosen as the authors are familiar with their experiments with the BSC.Findings – The main finding was that the BSC was used internally in both the Italian and Australian cases and little material was used for an external accountability reporting technology.Research limitations/implications – The analysis is limited to two LGOs locations, thus no generalisation can be implied.Originality/value – Few studies have reviewed, in the public sector, BSC practices, particularly for local governments.","PeriodicalId":119134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/14013380810872743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

Purpose – New public management changes in both the Australian and Italian government sectors have affected their modus operandi. This research aims to illustrate how the balanced scorecard (BSC) has been used in both Italian and Australian local government organisations (LGO), focusing on implementation and practice.Design/methodology/approach – A case study method is applied which was chosen to illustrate the use of the BSC model in both an Australian and an Italian LGO. These specific organisations were chosen as the authors are familiar with their experiments with the BSC.Findings – The main finding was that the BSC was used internally in both the Italian and Australian cases and little material was used for an external accountability reporting technology.Research limitations/implications – The analysis is limited to two LGOs locations, thus no generalisation can be implied.Originality/value – Few studies have reviewed, in the public sector, BSC practices, particularly for local governments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利和澳大利亚地方政府:平衡计分卡实践-研究笔记
目的-澳大利亚和意大利政府部门在公共管理方面的新变化影响了它们的运作方式。本研究旨在说明平衡计分卡(BSC)是如何在意大利和澳大利亚的地方政府组织(LGO)中使用的,重点是实施和实践。设计/方法论/方法-应用案例研究方法,选择该方法来说明平衡计分卡模型在澳大利亚和意大利LGO中的使用。之所以选择这些特定的组织,是因为作者熟悉他们对平衡记分卡的实验。调查结果-主要发现是平衡记分卡在意大利和澳大利亚的案例中都是内部使用的,很少有材料用于外部问责报告技术。研究限制/影响-分析仅限于两个地方政府融资平台的位置,因此不能暗示概括。原创性/价值-很少有研究审查公共部门的平衡计分卡实践,特别是地方政府的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of human resources in business model performance: The case of network-based companies A value case methodology to enable a transition towards generative health management: A case study from The Netherlands The analysis of intellectual capital evolution: a perspective on research Management control of work‐life balance. A narrative study of an Australian financial institution Bullying in context: a risk management perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1