LEARNING CIRCUIT AS AN EVALUATION TOOL IN BIOLOGY CLASSES

Marciano Coleta Leal, Adriéli Aparecida Rodrigues, João Ricardo Viola dos Santos
{"title":"LEARNING CIRCUIT AS AN EVALUATION TOOL IN BIOLOGY CLASSES","authors":"Marciano Coleta Leal, Adriéli Aparecida Rodrigues, João Ricardo Viola dos Santos","doi":"10.51249/jid.v4i01.1256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To create an evaluative instrument focused on the production of knowledge by students in Biology classes at a state school in the municipality of Sinop, Mato Grosso. Methodology: This is a descriptive study of the experience report type, developed with fourteen students of the 3rd year of high school between the months of September and November 2022. The evaluation instrument was constructed and developed during the classes of a Master’s discipline , formalized and applied by two master’s professors. It consists of two stages, developed by two teachers of basic education, Master’s students in Teaching Natural Sciences and Mathematics at the Federal University of Mato Grosso. The first stage was carried out in two moments: carrying out the circuit with the students, with the application of group activities, and subsequent socialization with the class. The second stage included the process of looking at what students think and feel in relation to the evaluative learning circuit as an evaluation process in the classroom, in Biology classes, and reflect, according to the view of these students, their concerns , that is, the positive and negative points of this evaluation instrument implemented in the classroom. Results: The proposal was accepted with great pleasure, since this reflection allowed both teachers involved to reflect on their practices in the classroom, seeking adaptations or improvements that may reflect on the students’ learning process. Likewise, students reported that the circuit was dynamic and brought learning in a lighter way, without leaving aside the scientific pedagogical context. Conclusion: It is possible to conclude, even partially, that the circuit is a positive instrument, which needs adaptations depending on the class with which the activity is developed. However, the learning and evaluation aspects must be considered in the same way, that is, none is more important than the other, but rather, they complement each other.","PeriodicalId":153934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Debates","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Debates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51249/jid.v4i01.1256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To create an evaluative instrument focused on the production of knowledge by students in Biology classes at a state school in the municipality of Sinop, Mato Grosso. Methodology: This is a descriptive study of the experience report type, developed with fourteen students of the 3rd year of high school between the months of September and November 2022. The evaluation instrument was constructed and developed during the classes of a Master’s discipline , formalized and applied by two master’s professors. It consists of two stages, developed by two teachers of basic education, Master’s students in Teaching Natural Sciences and Mathematics at the Federal University of Mato Grosso. The first stage was carried out in two moments: carrying out the circuit with the students, with the application of group activities, and subsequent socialization with the class. The second stage included the process of looking at what students think and feel in relation to the evaluative learning circuit as an evaluation process in the classroom, in Biology classes, and reflect, according to the view of these students, their concerns , that is, the positive and negative points of this evaluation instrument implemented in the classroom. Results: The proposal was accepted with great pleasure, since this reflection allowed both teachers involved to reflect on their practices in the classroom, seeking adaptations or improvements that may reflect on the students’ learning process. Likewise, students reported that the circuit was dynamic and brought learning in a lighter way, without leaving aside the scientific pedagogical context. Conclusion: It is possible to conclude, even partially, that the circuit is a positive instrument, which needs adaptations depending on the class with which the activity is developed. However, the learning and evaluation aspects must be considered in the same way, that is, none is more important than the other, but rather, they complement each other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习电路作为生物课的评估工具
目的:创建一个评估工具,重点关注马托格罗索州锡诺普市一所公立学校生物课学生的知识生产。方法:这是一项经验报告类型的描述性研究,由14名高中三年级学生在2022年9月至11月期间开发。评估工具是在硕士学科的课堂上构建和发展的,由两位硕士教授正式确定和应用。它包括两个阶段,由马托格罗索联邦大学自然科学和数学专业的两名基础教育教师和硕士生开发。第一阶段分为两个阶段:与学生一起进行巡回,应用小组活动,随后与班级进行社交。第二阶段包括观察学生在课堂上对作为评价过程的评价性学习回路的想法和感受的过程,在生物课上,根据这些学生的观点,反映他们的关注点,即在课堂上实施这种评价工具的积极和消极点。结果:这个建议被非常愉快地接受了,因为这个反思让参与的两位教师反思他们在课堂上的实践,寻求可能反映学生学习过程的适应性或改进。同样,学生们报告说,这个回路是动态的,在不离开科学教学背景的情况下,以一种更轻松的方式学习。结论:可以得出结论,甚至是部分结论,神经回路是一种积极的工具,需要根据活动发展的类别进行调整。然而,学习和评价方面必须以同样的方式考虑,即没有一个比另一个更重要,而是它们相辅相成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MATH ANXIETY PHYTOSANITARY PERCEPTION OF CASSAVA CROP AMONG PRODUCERS IN AGRICULTURAL SETTLEMENTS IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF AMAPÁ THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND CONTROL (PCM) IN THE PERFORMANCE OF MOBILE EQUIPMENT IN PORT OPERATIONS SENSORY METHODS THAT SUPPORT PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE IN AN IOT OPTICS IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION FIXED TIME AND IMPACT ON RURAL PROPERTIES OF FAMILY FARMERS IN THE APL LÁCTEO OESTE GOIANO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1