Value of a Core Research Module in the Medical Curriculum

Joshua Thomas, E. Bligh, E. Baggus, J. Thompson
{"title":"Value of a Core Research Module in the Medical Curriculum","authors":"Joshua Thomas, E. Bligh, E. Baggus, J. Thompson","doi":"10.5750/jmer.v1i1.1881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Application of research methods to medical research is a key skill that students should acquire during medical school. The value of a mandatory research module for students in terms of their understanding of medical research and the academic outputs that arise from the module are yet to be evaluated, especially compared to research undertaken through different avenues. \nMethod: Sheffield Medical Students were invited to complete a questionnaire on their thoughts of the research module, any academic outputs that arose from the module and any further research that they had undertaken outside the module. Ordinal regression analysis was used to assess for differences between groups’ answers to the Likert scales. \nResults: 101 students answered the questionnaire. 72.3% of students agreed that the module increased their knowledge of medical research, while fewer students agreed that it increased their interest in research and desire to undertake further research. Undergraduates agreed that the module increased their knowledge more than postgraduates (p = 0.048). There were no differences between the type of research project undertaken and students’ opinions of the module. Students gained more academic outputs, i.e. journal submissions and conference presentations, from research undertaken outside of the module. \nDiscussion: This research found that students’ main benefit from the module was increased knowledge of medical research, in agreement with previous studies. Limitations of the study included gaining no information on respondents’ age and previous research experience, which may have had an impact on their opinion of the research module.","PeriodicalId":151357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education Research","volume":"200 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/jmer.v1i1.1881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Application of research methods to medical research is a key skill that students should acquire during medical school. The value of a mandatory research module for students in terms of their understanding of medical research and the academic outputs that arise from the module are yet to be evaluated, especially compared to research undertaken through different avenues. Method: Sheffield Medical Students were invited to complete a questionnaire on their thoughts of the research module, any academic outputs that arose from the module and any further research that they had undertaken outside the module. Ordinal regression analysis was used to assess for differences between groups’ answers to the Likert scales. Results: 101 students answered the questionnaire. 72.3% of students agreed that the module increased their knowledge of medical research, while fewer students agreed that it increased their interest in research and desire to undertake further research. Undergraduates agreed that the module increased their knowledge more than postgraduates (p = 0.048). There were no differences between the type of research project undertaken and students’ opinions of the module. Students gained more academic outputs, i.e. journal submissions and conference presentations, from research undertaken outside of the module. Discussion: This research found that students’ main benefit from the module was increased knowledge of medical research, in agreement with previous studies. Limitations of the study included gaining no information on respondents’ age and previous research experience, which may have had an impact on their opinion of the research module.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核心研究模块在医学课程中的价值
将研究方法应用于医学研究是学生在医学院应掌握的一项关键技能。强制性研究模块对学生对医学研究的理解和该模块产生的学术成果的价值尚未得到评估,特别是与通过不同途径进行的研究进行比较。方法:谢菲尔德医学院的学生被邀请完成一份调查问卷,内容包括他们对研究模块的想法、模块产生的任何学术成果以及他们在模块之外进行的任何进一步研究。顺序回归分析用于评估各组之间对李克特量表的回答差异。结果:101名学生回答了问卷。72.3%的学生认为该模块增加了他们对医学研究的了解,而较少的学生认为该模块增加了他们对研究的兴趣和进行进一步研究的愿望。本科生认为该模块比研究生更能增加他们的知识(p = 0.048)。所承担的研究项目类型和学生对模块的意见之间没有差异。学生获得了更多的学术成果,即期刊投稿和会议演讲,从研究模块之外进行。讨论:本研究发现,学生从该模块中获得的主要好处是增加了医学研究的知识,这与之前的研究一致。该研究的局限性包括没有获得关于受访者年龄和以前的研究经验的信息,这可能会影响他们对研究模块的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Taking a Break? The Growing Trend of FY3: Why More Junior Doctors are Taking Time Out after the Foundation Programme and What They Elect to Do? Medical Students’ Knowledge of Autism Compared to the General Population: A Pilot Study Career intention of dermatology trainees following completion of training Establishing and promoting an ‘out-of-area’ programme for GP placements as a strategy to expand undergraduate experience in primary care The role of sustainability education within dermatological surgery in the United Kingdom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1