Empirical Indoor Path Loss Models at 3.5GHz for 5G Communications Network Planning

E. I. Adegoke, E. Kampert, M. Higgins
{"title":"Empirical Indoor Path Loss Models at 3.5GHz for 5G Communications Network Planning","authors":"E. I. Adegoke, E. Kampert, M. Higgins","doi":"10.1109/UCET51115.2020.9205413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present results of a measurement campaign at 3.5 GHz for 5G communications. Large-scale fading measurements have been carried out in an office building using a spectrum analyser and omnidirectional antennas in line-of-sight (LoS) and non line-of-sight (NLoS) co-polar scenarios. For the NLoS and LoS points, a linear track as well as spot locations were used to measure the receive power, with NLoS points resulting from obstructions. The transmitter–receiver (Tx-Rx) separation distance adopted in the measurement campaign ranged from 2 m to 20 m, with measurements averaged over 10 wavelengths at each location. From the measurement data, empirical path loss models were obtained to fit the measurement data. For the LoS points investigated, the path loss exponent varied between 1.32 and 1.95, while a path loss exponent of 1.78 was obtained for NLoS scenarios. The model comparison carried out showed that the ITU-R model overestimates the path loss in LoS scenarios, while the FSPL underestimates the path loss.","PeriodicalId":163493,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on UK-China Emerging Technologies (UCET)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on UK-China Emerging Technologies (UCET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UCET51115.2020.9205413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In this paper, we present results of a measurement campaign at 3.5 GHz for 5G communications. Large-scale fading measurements have been carried out in an office building using a spectrum analyser and omnidirectional antennas in line-of-sight (LoS) and non line-of-sight (NLoS) co-polar scenarios. For the NLoS and LoS points, a linear track as well as spot locations were used to measure the receive power, with NLoS points resulting from obstructions. The transmitter–receiver (Tx-Rx) separation distance adopted in the measurement campaign ranged from 2 m to 20 m, with measurements averaged over 10 wavelengths at each location. From the measurement data, empirical path loss models were obtained to fit the measurement data. For the LoS points investigated, the path loss exponent varied between 1.32 and 1.95, while a path loss exponent of 1.78 was obtained for NLoS scenarios. The model comparison carried out showed that the ITU-R model overestimates the path loss in LoS scenarios, while the FSPL underestimates the path loss.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向5G通信网络规划的3.5GHz室内路径损耗实证模型
在本文中,我们介绍了用于5G通信的3.5 GHz测量活动的结果。利用频谱分析仪和全向天线在视距(LoS)和非视距(NLoS)共极场景下对办公楼进行了大规模衰落测量。对于NLoS和LoS点,采用线性轨迹和光斑位置来测量接收功率,NLoS点由障碍物产生。在测量活动中采用的收发器(Tx-Rx)分离距离范围为2米至20米,在每个位置测量平均超过10个波长。根据测量数据,建立了经验路径损耗模型来拟合测量数据。路径损失指数在1.32 ~ 1.95之间变化,而NLoS情景的路径损失指数为1.78。模型对比表明,ITU-R模型高估了LoS场景下的路径损耗,而FSPL模型低估了路径损耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smart Wristband for Gesture Recognition Foldable, Eco-Friendly and Low-Cost Microfluidic Paper-Based Capacitive Droplet Sensor A Wearable Health Monitoring System A Novel Approach for Classifying Diabetes’ Patients Based on Imputation and Machine Learning Towards Holographic Beam-Forming Metasurface Technology for Next Generation CubeSats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1