What's the smallest part of spinach? A new experimental approach to the count/mass distinction

Sea Hee Choi, T. Ionin
{"title":"What's the smallest part of spinach? A new experimental approach to the count/mass distinction","authors":"Sea Hee Choi, T. Ionin","doi":"10.3765/elm.1.4867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports on a study that uses a novel methodology, the minimal part identification task, in order to probe the relationship between morphosyntax and interpretation. English, Korean and Mandarin Chinese differ from one another with regard to the count/mass distinction. Building on prior research but using a new methodology, this study examines whether speakers of these three languages also differ in how they interpret count vs. mass nouns. The findings, while uncovering some language-specific effects of morphosyntax, point to the importance of universality, and suggest that interpretation drives morphosyntax rather than the other way around.","PeriodicalId":154565,"journal":{"name":"Experiments in Linguistic Meaning","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experiments in Linguistic Meaning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3765/elm.1.4867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports on a study that uses a novel methodology, the minimal part identification task, in order to probe the relationship between morphosyntax and interpretation. English, Korean and Mandarin Chinese differ from one another with regard to the count/mass distinction. Building on prior research but using a new methodology, this study examines whether speakers of these three languages also differ in how they interpret count vs. mass nouns. The findings, while uncovering some language-specific effects of morphosyntax, point to the importance of universality, and suggest that interpretation drives morphosyntax rather than the other way around.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菠菜最小的部分是什么?计数/质量区分的新实验方法
本文报道了一项研究,使用一种新颖的方法,最小部分识别任务,以探讨形态语法和解释之间的关系。英语、韩语和普通话在计数/质量区分方面彼此不同。在先前研究的基础上,这项研究使用了一种新的方法,研究了这三种语言的使用者在解释数量名词和质量名词方面是否也存在差异。这些发现,虽然揭示了形态句法的一些语言特异性影响,但指出了普遍性的重要性,并表明解释驱动形态句法,而不是反过来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The rise and particularly fall of presuppositions: Evidence from duality in universals Reading times show effects of contextual complexity and uncertainty in comprehension of German universal quantifiers Five degrees of (non)sense: Investigating the connection between bullshit receptivity and susceptibility to semantic illusions Real-time processing of indexical and generic expressions: Insights from, and implications for, COVID-related public health messages Semantics of Non-Doxastic Attitude Ascriptions from Experimental Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1