{"title":"The interplay between extraterritoriality, sovereignty, and the foundations of international law","authors":"Austen L. Parrish","doi":"10.4324/9781351231992-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter explores the interplay between international law, territorial sovereignty, and extraterritorial regulation. It: (1) describes how particular legal theories of global governance that downplay the importance of territorial sovereignty and sovereign equality in international law have bolstered an expansive view of national power; and (2) traces the growth, until recently, of extraterritorial regulation in the United States. It suggests that the use domestic law applied to foreign conduct is a form of American exceptionalism that usually is a way to avoid international law's constraints. It concludes that working within the existing international law system to promote cosmopolitan goals may be the better path to advancing transnational justice.","PeriodicalId":161229,"journal":{"name":"The Extraterritoriality of Law","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Extraterritoriality of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351231992-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The chapter explores the interplay between international law, territorial sovereignty, and extraterritorial regulation. It: (1) describes how particular legal theories of global governance that downplay the importance of territorial sovereignty and sovereign equality in international law have bolstered an expansive view of national power; and (2) traces the growth, until recently, of extraterritorial regulation in the United States. It suggests that the use domestic law applied to foreign conduct is a form of American exceptionalism that usually is a way to avoid international law's constraints. It concludes that working within the existing international law system to promote cosmopolitan goals may be the better path to advancing transnational justice.