Validation of Cause-Effect Relationship in the Context of Organizational Citizenship Behaviour and its Antecedents: The Case of Asan Service in Azerbaijan

A. Zeynalov
{"title":"Validation of Cause-Effect Relationship in the Context of Organizational Citizenship Behaviour and its Antecedents: The Case of Asan Service in Azerbaijan","authors":"A. Zeynalov","doi":"10.15804/ksm20210304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Williams, L.J., Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job organizational behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. The current study validates the structural model of cause-effect relationship in light of organizational citizenship behaviour as a consequence and its determinants as causes, which ultimately generates a generalizable public service model for the countries that need substantial organizational transformation in public service delivery. The determinants of organizational citizenship behavior by taking a look into the social and personal factors that either drive an indi-vidual’s behavior drawing from the social circumstances at the moment of time, or personal motivation and inner characteristics that force an individual to act in favor or against good citizenship. To test the proposed research framework, post-community Azerbaijan’s ASAN Service is considered as the case. For the identification and validation of potential factors affecting organizational citizenship behaviour, the selected variables are employed as constructs of the conceptual framework, through which survey is designed and administered to collect data from the country citizens with regards of gauging the impact of the determinants. A quantitative methodological approach is selected, where data is collected through convenient sampling technique, while it is analysed using the structural equation modelling technique, with emphasis on AMOS v.24 software to test the structural model. The results of the hypothesized relations reveal that behavioural intention and organizational identification are strongly related to organizational citizenship behaviour, followed by distributive justice, public service motivation, self-concept and goal clarity being secondary major determinants. However, procedural justice is not significant in predicting organizational citizenship behaviour, while subjective norm and task interdependence are weakly related to it .","PeriodicalId":431204,"journal":{"name":"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie","volume":"271 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/ksm20210304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Williams, L.J., Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job organizational behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. The current study validates the structural model of cause-effect relationship in light of organizational citizenship behaviour as a consequence and its determinants as causes, which ultimately generates a generalizable public service model for the countries that need substantial organizational transformation in public service delivery. The determinants of organizational citizenship behavior by taking a look into the social and personal factors that either drive an indi-vidual’s behavior drawing from the social circumstances at the moment of time, or personal motivation and inner characteristics that force an individual to act in favor or against good citizenship. To test the proposed research framework, post-community Azerbaijan’s ASAN Service is considered as the case. For the identification and validation of potential factors affecting organizational citizenship behaviour, the selected variables are employed as constructs of the conceptual framework, through which survey is designed and administered to collect data from the country citizens with regards of gauging the impact of the determinants. A quantitative methodological approach is selected, where data is collected through convenient sampling technique, while it is analysed using the structural equation modelling technique, with emphasis on AMOS v.24 software to test the structural model. The results of the hypothesized relations reveal that behavioural intention and organizational identification are strongly related to organizational citizenship behaviour, followed by distributive justice, public service motivation, self-concept and goal clarity being secondary major determinants. However, procedural justice is not significant in predicting organizational citizenship behaviour, while subjective norm and task interdependence are weakly related to it .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织公民行为及其前因背景下的因果关系验证:以阿塞拜疆牙山服务为例
威廉姆斯,l.j.,安德森,S.E.(1991)。工作组织行为。管理学报,17,601-617。本研究从组织公民行为作为结果和决定因素作为原因的角度对因果关系的结构模型进行了验证,最终为需要在公共服务提供方面进行实质性组织转型的国家提供了一个可推广的公共服务模型。组织公民行为的决定因素是通过观察社会和个人因素来确定的,这些因素既可以驱动个人的行为,也可以驱动个人的动机和内在特征,这些因素可以从当时的社会环境中提取,也可以迫使个人采取赞成或反对良好公民的行动。为了测试提出的研究框架,后社区阿塞拜疆的ASAN服务被视为案例。为了识别和验证影响组织公民行为的潜在因素,选定的变量被用作概念框架的结构,通过该概念框架设计和管理调查,以收集来自国家公民的数据,以衡量决定因素的影响。选择定量方法方法,通过方便的抽样技术收集数据,同时使用结构方程建模技术进行分析,重点是AMOS v.24软件来测试结构模型。假设关系的结果表明,行为意愿和组织认同与组织公民行为密切相关,其次是分配正义、公共服务动机、自我概念和目标清晰度。程序公正对组织公民行为的预测不显著,主观规范和任务相互依赖对组织公民行为的预测作用较弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How the natural resource curse contributed to the autocratic developments in Russian politics since the fall of the USSR Methodological importance of legal constructions and their influence on the legal norms interpretation Democratization and federalization. A comparative perspective between Russia’s and Spain’s early forays into a federal system Prospects for introducing the concept of “digital things” and “digital content”: expanding the scope of regulation of virtual assets Francuska polityka kolonialna w Afryce Zachodniej
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1